Prostate-specific antigen testing: men's responses to 2012 recommendation against screening
- PMID: 23867025
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.04.005
Prostate-specific antigen testing: men's responses to 2012 recommendation against screening
Abstract
Background: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) released a draft recommendation advising against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in October 2011, a major shift from previous years of recommending neither for or against PSA testing due to insufficient evidence.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess men's awareness of the new recommendation, and their responses to it.
Methods: This study comprised a web survey of men aged 40-74 years that was conducted through GfK Custom Research, LLC's Knowledge Panel® from November 22 to December 2, 2011. Chi-square tests and logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with disagreement with and intention to follow the recommendation. Data were analyzed in March 2012.
Results: The survey sample included 1089 men without a history of prostate cancer. After reviewing the recommendation, 62% agreed with the recommendation. Age and worry about getting prostate cancer were significantly related to disagreement with the recommendation. Only 13% of respondents were intenders (they planned to follow the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation and not get a prostate-specific antigen test in the future); 54% were non-intenders (they planned to not follow the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation and get a prostate-specific antigen test in the future; and 33% were undecided. Black race, higher income, having a PSA test in the past 2 years, and being somewhat/very worried about getting prostate cancer were all positively associated with being a non-intender.
Conclusions: Study findings suggest that consumers are favorably disposed to PSA testing, despite new evidence suggesting that the harms outweigh the benefits. The new USPSTF recommendation against PSA testing in all men may be met with resistance.
Copyright © 2013 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Primary care physician PSA screening practices before and after the final U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation.Urol Oncol. 2014 Jan;32(1):41.e23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 Aug 2. Urol Oncol. 2014. PMID: 23911680
-
Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 17;157(2):120-34. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22801674
-
Impact of the 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force statement on prostate-specific antigen screening: analysis of urologic and primary care practices.Urology. 2015 Jan;85(1):85-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.07.072. Epub 2014 Nov 11. Urology. 2015. PMID: 25440819
-
Prostate Cancer Screening and the Associated Controversy.Surg Clin North Am. 2015 Oct;95(5):1023-39. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 Jun 23. Surg Clin North Am. 2015. PMID: 26315521 Review.
-
Impact of the United States Preventive Services Task Force 'D' recommendation on prostate cancer screening and staging.Curr Opin Urol. 2017 May;27(3):205-209. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000383. Curr Opin Urol. 2017. PMID: 28221220 Review.
Cited by
-
Perspectives and Misconceptions of an Online Adult Male Cohort Regarding Prostate Cancer Screening.Curr Oncol. 2024 Oct 20;31(10):6395-6405. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31100475. Curr Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39451779 Free PMC article.
-
Urologists' and general practitioners' knowledge, beliefs and practice relevant for opportunistic prostate cancer screening: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 16;11:1283654. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1283654. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 38435387 Free PMC article.
-
Testing a Prostate Cancer Educational Intervention in High-Burden Neighborhoods.J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Dec;9(6):2477-2484. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01183-5. Epub 2021 Nov 8. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022. PMID: 34748171 Free PMC article.
-
Multilevel Small Area Estimation of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Test in the United States by Age Group: 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 May-Jun;34(3):634-647. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.03.200505. J Am Board Fam Med. 2021. PMID: 34088823 Free PMC article.
-
Use of the prostate-specific antigen test in the U.S. for men age 30 to 64 in 2011 to 2017 using a large commercial claims database: Implications for practice interventions.Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2021 Aug;4(4):e1365. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1365. Epub 2021 May 2. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2021. PMID: 33934557 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
