ADHD Diagnosis: As Simple As Administering a Questionnaire or a Complex Diagnostic Process?

J Atten Disord. 2016 Jun;20(6):478-86. doi: 10.1177/1087054713495736. Epub 2013 Jul 25.

Abstract

Objective: The present study investigated the validity of using the Conners' Teacher and Parent Rating Scales (CTRS/CPRS) or semistructured diagnostic interviews (Parent Interview for Child Symptoms and Teacher Telephone Interview) to predict a best-practices clinical diagnosis of ADHD.

Method: A total of 279 children received a clinical diagnosis based on a best-practices comprehensive assessment (including diagnostic parent and teacher interviews, collection of historical information, rating scales, classroom observations, and a psychoeducational assessment) at a specialty ADHD Clinic in Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada. Sensitivity and specificity with clinical diagnosis were determined for the ratings scales and diagnostic interviews.

Results: Sensitivity and specificity values were high for the diagnostic interviews (91.8% and 70.7%, respectively). However, while sensitivity of the CTRS/CPRS was relatively high (83.5%), specificity was poor (35.7%).

Conclusion: The low specificity of the CPRS/CTRS is not sufficient to be used alone to diagnose ADHD. (J. of Att. Dis. 2016; 20(6) 478-486).

Keywords: ADHD; assessment; diagnosis; interviews; rating scales; sensitivity; specificity.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity / diagnosis*
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Interview, Psychological
  • Male
  • Nova Scotia
  • Parents
  • Psychiatric Status Rating Scales / standards
  • School Teachers
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Surveys and Questionnaires / standards*