The effect of colorectal cancer screening mandates on access to care and clinical outcomes: a retrospective study of patients undergoing operations of the colon and rectum
- PMID: 23889960
- DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.037
The effect of colorectal cancer screening mandates on access to care and clinical outcomes: a retrospective study of patients undergoing operations of the colon and rectum
Abstract
Introduction: Policies that mandate colorectal screening coverage by private insurers are associated with increased use of screening procedures. We seek to understand whether such mandates have improved access to care and short-term operative outcomes for patients undergoing operations of the colon and rectum (OCR).
Methods: Privately insured OCR patients, ages 50-64, enrolled in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) (2000-2009) were identified. Patients were classified as "exposed" if they underwent OCR in a state that implemented a mandate ≥ 2 years before their procedure. Three outcomes were examined: admission source, postoperative complications, and postoperative mortality. Univariate analyses were performed by the use of logistic regression models. Multivariable logistic regression models were developed to evaluate the relationship between exposure status, admission source, postoperative complications, and postoperative mortality, with adjustment for confounders.
Results: We identified 99,405 patients who underwent OCR during the study period. Of these patients, 39% were "exposed," 23% were admitted from the ED, 32% developed a postoperative complication, and 2% died during the admission. After adjusting for confounders, exposed patients were less likely to access OCR through the emergency department (odds ratio 0.87; 95% confidence interval 0.83-0.91) and less likely to develop postoperative complications (odds ratio 0.94; 95% confidence interval 0.89-0.98). There was no detectable difference in postoperative mortality.
Conclusion: Implementation of policies mandating coverage of colorectal screening modestly reduced emergent admission for OCR among privately insured patients. Additional studies are required to examine the screening status of patients to determine causality. Remaining states should consider implementing similar policies.
Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Morbidity and mortality of colorectal carcinoma surgery differs by insurance status.Cancer. 2004 Nov 15;101(10):2187-94. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20624. Cancer. 2004. PMID: 15382089
-
Comparison of hospital performance in nonemergency versus emergency colorectal operations at 142 hospitals.J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Feb;210(2):155-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.10.016. Epub 2009 Dec 24. J Am Coll Surg. 2010. PMID: 20113935
-
Colorectal surgery in kidney transplant recipients: a decade of trends and outcomes in the United States.Am Surg. 2013 Oct;79(10):1026-33. Am Surg. 2013. PMID: 24160793
-
Postoperative and long-term outcomes after redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: retrospective analysis of 50 patients and review of the literature.Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Jun;56(6):747-55. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182853c44. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013. PMID: 23652749 Review.
-
[The efficacy of the multidisciplinary approach in colorectal cancer surgery in elderly patients].Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2012;(2):4-13. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2012. PMID: 22678468 Review. Russian.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
