Biological and electrophysiologic effects of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) on regenerating peripheral nerve fibers

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Aug;132(2):374-385. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182959f63.

Abstract

Background: Uninjured peripheral nerves in upper-limb amputees represent attractive sites for connectivity with neuroprostheses because their predictable internal topography allows for precise sorting of motor and sensory signals. The inclusion of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) reduces impedance and improves charge transfer at the biotic-abiotic interface. This study evaluates the in vivo performance of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-coated interpositional decellularized nerve grafts across a critical nerve conduction gap, and examines the long-term effects of two different poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) formulations on regenerating peripheral nerve fibers.

Methods: In 48 rats, a 15-mm gap in the common peroneal nerve was repaired using a nerve graft of equivalent length, including (1) decellularized nerve chemically polymerized with poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (dry); (2) decellularized nerve electrochemically polymerized with poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (wet); (3) intact nerve; (4) autogenous nerve graft; (5) decellularized nerve alone; and (6) unrepaired nerve gap controls. All groups underwent electrophysiologic characterization at 3 months, and nerves were harvested for histomorphometric analysis.

Results: Conduction velocity was significantly faster in the dry poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) group compared with the sham, decellularized nerve, and wet poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) groups. Maximum specific force for the dry poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) group was more similar to sham than were decellularized nerve controls. Evident neural regeneration was demonstrated in both dry and wet poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) groups by the presence of normal regenerating axons on histologic cross-section.

Conclusions: Both poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) formulations were compatible with peripheral nerve regeneration at 3 months. This study supports poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) as a promising adjunct for peripheral nerve interfaces for prosthetic control and other biomedical applications because of its recognized ionic-to-electronic coupling potential.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic / pharmacology*
  • Disease Models, Animal
  • Electrophysiology
  • Male
  • Nerve Fibers / drug effects*
  • Nerve Fibers / physiology
  • Nerve Regeneration / drug effects*
  • Nerve Regeneration / physiology
  • Nerve Transfer / methods
  • Neural Conduction / drug effects
  • Neural Conduction / physiology
  • Peripheral Nerve Injuries / drug therapy
  • Peripheral Nerve Injuries / surgery
  • Peroneal Nerve / drug effects*
  • Peroneal Nerve / injuries
  • Peroneal Nerve / surgery
  • Polymers / pharmacology*
  • Random Allocation
  • Rats
  • Rats, Inbred F344
  • Reference Values
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Substances

  • Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic
  • Polymers
  • poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene)