Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep 1;191(5):2299-307.
doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300472. Epub 2013 Jul 31.

Inhibition of TGF-β1 signaling promotes central memory T cell differentiation

Affiliations

Inhibition of TGF-β1 signaling promotes central memory T cell differentiation

Shinji Takai et al. J Immunol. .

Abstract

This study affirmed that isolated CD8(+) T cells express mRNA and produce TGF-β following cognate peptide recognition. Blockage of endogenous TGF-β with either a TGF-β-blocking Ab or a small molecule inhibitor of TGF-βRI enhances the generation of CD62L(high)/CD44(high) central memory CD8(+) T cells accompanied with a robust recall response. Interestingly, the augmentation within the central memory T cell pool occurs in lieu of cellular proliferation or activation, but with the expected increase in the ratio of the Eomesoderm/T-bet transcriptional factors. Yet, the signal transduction pathway(s) seems to be noncanonical, independent of SMAD or mammalian target of rapamycin signaling. Enhancement of central memory generation by TGF-β blockade is also confirmed in human PBMCs. The findings underscore the role(s) that autocrine TGF-β plays in T cell homeostasis and, in particular, the balance of effector/memory and central/memory T cells. These results may provide a rationale to targeting TGF-β signaling to enhance Ag-specific CD8(+) T cell memory against a lethal infection or cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Temporal-dependent in vitro production of TGF-β, IFN-γ and IL-2 by isolated CD8+ T cells following cognate peptide stimulation. Splenic CD8+ T cells from TCR transgenic mice for the nucleoprotein of influenza virus NP68 (F5 Tg-mice) were isolated by magnetic beads, and stimulated with 10−4 µg/ml of cognate peptide (NP68 peptide), 1.0 µg/ml of H2Db-dimer X and 2.0 µg/ml of anti-CD28. (A) TGF-β mRNA as measured by quantitative PCR at the indicated time points. (B) TGF-β1, (C) IFN-γ and (D) IL-2 production in the T cell culture supernatant as measured using appropriate cytokine ELISA assays. Data represent the mean ± SE of triplicate samples from three independent experiments.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Blockade of TGF-β signaling increased central memory T cell phenotype. Splenic CD8+ T cells isolated from F5 mice were pretreated with either the anti-TGF-β mAb (0.1–10 µg/ml) or TGF-β receptor I kinase inhibitor, SD208 (0.3–3.0 µM), for 1 hr prior to stimulation with 10−4 µg/ml of the cognate peptide (NP68 peptide), 1.0 µg/ml of H2Db-dimer X and 2.0 µg/ml of anti-CD28 and all analyses were performed 72 h later. (A) Flow cytometric analyses of F5-CD8+ T cells, as determined by anti-CD62L and either anti-CD44 (upper panel) or anti-CD127 (lower panel) are shown. (B) Total number of CD62Lhigh/CD44high central memory (solid bars) versus CD62Llow/CD44high effector memory (open bars) CD8+ T cells recovered and assessed by trypan-blue exclusion. *, p<0.05 (0.1 µg/ml vs 1.0 and 10 µg/ml anti-TGF-β mAb); ***, p<0.001 (untreated vs. 0.1 µg/ml vs 1.0 and 10 µg/ml anti-TGF-β mAb) (C) IFN-γ production as measured by ELISA. **p<0.01 untreated vs. 0.1 µg/ml anti-TGF-β mAb); ***, p<0.001 (untreated vs. 1.0 and 10 µg/ml anti-TGF-β mAb) (D) SD208 effects on the phenotypic changes of F5-CD8+ T cells, as determined by anti-CD62L and anti-CD44. (E) Total number of CD62Lhigh/CD44high central memory (solid bars) versus CD62Llow/CD44high effector memory (open bars) CD8+ T cells recovered and assessed by trypan-blue exclusion. *, p<0.05 (untreated vs 0.3 µM SD208); **, p<0.05 (untreated vs 1 µM SD208); ***, p<0.001 (untreated vs. 3 µM SD208). (F–H) Splenocytes from C57BL/6 mice were pre-incubated with various doses of SD208 (0.3–3.0 µM) for 1 hr, and stimulated with 2.5 µg/ml of anti-CD3 and 1.25 µg/ml of anti-CD28 and all analyses were done 72 hr later. (F) Flow cytometric analyses of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells stained with anti-CD62L and anti-CD44 antibodies. Numbers in each upper right quadrant denote percentage of cells. (G and H) Total number of (G) CD8+ or (H) CD4+ CD62Lhigh/CD44high central memory (solid bars) versus CD62Llow/CD44high effector memory (open bars) T cells recovered following stimulation with cognate peptide. Cell numbers were determined by trypan-blue exclusion and the total number of CD8+, CD4+, CD62Llow/CD44high, CD62Lhigh/CD44high cells were determined based on flow cytometry data. (G) CD8+ - *, p<0.05 (0.3 vs 1.0 µM & 1.0 vs. 3.0 µM SD208); ***, p<0.001 (untreated vs. 0.3, 1.0 and 3.0 µM; 0.3 vs. 3.0 µM SD208). (H) CD4+ - ***, p<0.001 (untreated vs. 0.3, 1.0 and 3.0 µM SD208). Data are the mean ± SE of triplicate samples of at least three independent experiments. Statistical significance was measured by the one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Exogenous TGF-β inhibits central memory CD8+ T cell differentiation. Splenocytes from F5 mice were pre-incubated with 0.1–5.0 ng/ml recombinant human TGF-β1 for 1 hr and then stimulated with 10−4 µg/ml cognate peptide for 72 hr. (A) Flow cytometric analysis of the phenotypic changes 72 hr after peptide stimulation. Cells were stained with anti-CD8a, CD62L and CD44 (upper panel in A) or CD127 (lower panel in A). Numbers in each quadrant denote percentage of cells. (B) IFN-γ production in the culture supernatant measured by ELISA. ***, p<0.001 (untreated vs. 0.1, 0.5, 1.0 and 5.0 ng/ml rhTGF-β). (C) Number of CD62Lhigh/CD44high central memory (solid bars) versus CD62Llow/CD44high effector memory (open bars) CD8+ T cells recovered following stimulation with cognate peptide. Total viable cells were determined by trypan-blue exclusion and the total number of CD8+, CD62Llow/CD44high/CD8+, CD62Lhigh/CD44high CD8+ cells were determined based on flow cytometry data. Data are the mean ± SEM of triplicate samples from three independent experiments. (D) Apoptotic cells, as determined by staining with anti-CD8a and Annexin-V antibodies, after exogenous TGF-β pre-incubation and peptide stimulation. **, p<0.01 (untreated vs. 1.0 ng/ml rhTGF-β). ***, p<0.001 (untreated vs. 0.1, 0.5 and 5.0 ng/ml rhTGF-β). Data are the mean ± SE of triplicate samples from three independent experiments. Statistical significance was measured by the one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test.
Figure 4
Figure 4
TGF-β blockade of central memory T cell differentiation is not mediated through SMAD or MAPK super family signaling pathways. (A) CD8+ T cells were pre-incubated with SD208 (0.3–3.0 µM) for 1 hr, then treated with 5 ng/ml of recombinant human TGF-β1. Cells were harvested 1 hr later and the phosphorylation of the Erk, P38 MAPK and JNK signal transduction pathways was examined using Western immunoblots. (B) Splenocytes from SMAD2 conditional knockout (CKO) mice were pre-incubated with 1–10 µg/ml TGF-β mAb for 1 hr, stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 for 72 hr and then stained with anti-CD8a, CD4, CD44 and CD62L antibodies and analyzed by flow cytometry. Numbers in the upper right quadrant denote percentage of cells. (C) Splenocytes from F5 mice were pre-incubated with 3 µM of SD208 for 1 hr, stimulated with cognate peptide, and p70 and S6 phosphorylation in the TORC1 pathway was examined by Western immunoblot at the indicated time points.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Change of transcriptional factors T-bet and Eomes following TGF-β blockade. Isolated splenic CD8+ T cells from F5 mice were pre-incubated with 1 µg/ml of TGF-β mAb for 1 hr and then stimulated with 10−4 µg/ml of cognate peptide (NP68 peptide), 1.0 µg/ml of H2Db-dimer X and 2.0 µg/ml of anti-CD28. (A) T-bet mRNA levels, (B) Eomes *, p<0.05 (untreated; open circle vs. 1.0 µg/ml anti-TGF-β MAb; filled circle @ 72 hrs) (C) Eomes/ T-bet mRNA calculated ratios. ***, p<0.001 (untreated vs. 1.0 µg/ml anti-TGF-β mAb @ 48 and 72 hrs). (D) T-bet and Eomes protein expressions measured by intracellular FACS and calculated ratio at 96 hr post-peptide. (E) Eomes/ T-bet protein ratios calculated ratios. **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001 (untreated vs. 0.1, 1 and 10 µg/ml anti-TGF-β mAb) Statistical significance was determined using the two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test (A, B and C) or the one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test (E).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Increased central memory phenotype alters in vivo proliferation upon recall response. Splenocytes from F5 mice were pre-incubated with 3 µM of SD208 or vehicle for 1 hr, stimulated with 10−4 µg/ml of cognate peptide for 96 hr and then stained with anti-CD8, CD62L and CD44. (A) CD62L and CD44 expression on CD8 T cells 96 hr after in vitro stimulation. (B) In vivo distribution of adoptively transferred F5 memory CD8+ T cells after 3 days and prior to rF-NP68-TRICOM vaccination. Mice (3/group) were euthanized and the peripheral blood, spleen and inguinal lymph nodes were analyzed for NP68 dextramer staining. Each dot represents a single mouse and the horizontal line indicates the mean. NS: no statistical significance. (C) A representative FACS plot for each group. The numbers in the top right quadrant denote the percentage of CD62Lhigh/CD44high cells among CD8+/dextramer+ T cells from splenocyte. (D) A representative CFSE dilution for each group of CD8+/dextramer+ T cells from splenocyte. (E–G) Recall response 3 days after rF-NP68-TRICOM challenge. Peripheral blood from rF-NP68-TRICOM vaccinated mice (n=3/group) (no adoptive transfer, adoptive transfer with vehicle treated-cells and adoptive transfer with SD208-treated-cells) was collected and analyzed for NP68 dextramer staining. (E) A representative FACS plot for each group. The numbers in the top right quadrant denote the percentage of dextramer+ cells among CD8+ T cells. (F) Each dot represents a single mouse and the horizontal line indicates the mean. (G) A representative CFSE dye dilution for each group of CD8+/dextramer+ T cells from a single experiment. Three separate experiments were carried out and the increased proliferation in the SD208-treated T cells was statistically significant (p<0.01) as measured using the one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Increased central memory T cells in human PBMCs following TGF-β blockade. (A) CD62L expression on gated CD8+/CD45RO+ cells 6 days after anti-CD3 stimulation. Numbers in the upper and lower quadrants denote percentage of CD62Lhigh and MFI of CD62L expression on CD8+ T cells, respectively. (B) Total number of CD62Lhigh/CD45RO+ central memory (solid bars) versus CD62Llow/CD45RO+ effector memory (open bars) CD8+ T cells recovered following stimulation with anti-human CD3. The number of viable cells was determined by trypan-blue exclusion and the total number of CD8+, CD62Llow/CD45RO+, CD62Lhigh/ CD45RO+ cells was determined based on flow cytometry data. *, p<0.05 (untreated vs. 0.3 µM SD208); **, p<0.01 (untreated vs. 1.0 µM SD208); ***, p<0.001 (untreated vs. 3.0 µM SD208). (C) IFN-γ production in the culture supernatant as measured by ELISA. Data are the mean ± SE of triplicate samples of at least three independent experiments. Statistical significance was measured using the one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Klebanoff CA, Gattinoni L, Torabi-Parizi P, Kerstann K, Cardones AR, Finkelstein SE, Palmer DC, Antony PA, Hwang ST, Rosenberg SA, Waldmann TA, Restifo NP. Central memory self/tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells confer superior antitumor immunity compared with effector memory T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:9571–9576. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vaccari M, Trindade CJ, Venzon D, Zanetti M, Franchini G. Vaccine-induced CD8+ central memory T cells in protection from simian AIDS. J. Immunol. 2005;175:3502–3507. - PubMed
    1. Wherry EJ, Teichgräber V, Becker TC, Masopust D, Kaech SM, Antia R, von Andrian UH, Ahmed R. Lineage relationship and protective immunity of memory CD8 T cell subsets. Nat. Immunol. 2003;4:225–234. - PubMed
    1. Fearon DT, Carr JM, Telaranta A, Carrasco MJ, Thaventhiran JE. The rationale for the IL-2-independent generation of the self-renewing central memory CD8+ T cells. Immunol. Rev. 2006;211:104–118. Review. - PubMed
    1. Laouar A, Manocha M, Haridas V, Manjunath N. Concurrent generation of effector and central memory CD8 T cells during vaccinia virus infection. PLoS One. 2008;3:e4089. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances