Does winning a pay-for-performance bonus improve subsequent quality performance? Evidence from the Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration
- PMID: 23909992
- PMCID: PMC3976187
- DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12097
Does winning a pay-for-performance bonus improve subsequent quality performance? Evidence from the Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration
Abstract
Objective: To test whether receiving a financial bonus for quality in the Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration (HQID) stimulated subsequent quality improvement.
Data: Hospital-level data on process-of-care quality from Hospital Compare for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure, and pneumonia for 260 hospitals participating in the HQID from 2004 to 2006; receipt of quality bonuses in the first 3 years of HQID from the Premier Inc. website; and hospital characteristics from the 2005 American Hospital Association Annual Survey.
Study design: Under the HQID, hospitals received a 1 percent bonus on Medicare payments for scoring between the 80th and 90th percentiles on a composite quality measure, and a 2 percent bonus for scoring at the 90th percentile or above. We used a regression discontinuity design to evaluate whether hospitals with quality scores just above these payment thresholds improved more in the subsequent year than hospitals with quality scores just below the thresholds. In alternative specifications, we examined samples of hospitals scoring within 3, 5, and 10 percentage point "bandwidths" of the thresholds. We used a Generalized Linear Model to estimate whether the relationship between quality and lagged quality was discontinuous at the lagged thresholds required for quality bonuses.
Principal findings: There were no statistically significant associations between receipt of a bonus and subsequent quality performance, with the exception of the 2 percent bonus for AMI in 2006 using the 5 percentage point bandwidth (0.8 percentage point increase, p<.01), and the 1 percent bonus for pneumonia in 2005 using all bandwidths (3.7 percentage point increase using the 3 percentage point bandwidth, p<.05).
Conclusions: We found little evidence that hospitals' receipt of quality bonuses was associated with subsequent improvement in performance. This raises questions about whether winning in pay-for-performance programs, such as Hospital Value-Based Purchasing, will lead to subsequent quality improvement.
Keywords: Pay-for-performance; hospitals; incentive; quality improvement.
© Health Research and Educational Trust.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The effect of Phase 2 of the Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration on incentive payments to hospitals caring for disadvantaged patients.Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug;47(4):1418-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01393.x. Epub 2012 Mar 14. Health Serv Res. 2012. PMID: 22417137 Free PMC article.
-
Higher Incentive Payments in Medicare Advantage's Pay-for-Performance Program Did Not Improve Quality But Did Increase Plan Offerings.Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec;50(6):1810-28. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12409. Epub 2015 Nov 9. Health Serv Res. 2015. PMID: 26549194 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of pay-for-performance on quality of care for minority patients.Am J Manag Care. 2014 Oct 1;20(10):e479-86. Am J Manag Care. 2014. PMID: 25414986
-
Paying for Performance Improvement in Quality and Outcomes of Cardiovascular Care: Challenges and Prospects.Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2020 Jul-Sep;16(3):225-231. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-16-3-225. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2020. PMID: 33133359 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7;(9):CD008451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008451.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. PMID: 21901722 Review.
Cited by
-
Public Reporting on the Quality of Care in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Korean Experience.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 8;19(6):3169. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063169. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35328856 Free PMC article.
-
Performance Pay in Hospitals: An Experiment on Bonus-Malus Incentives.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 10;17(22):8320. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228320. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33182846 Free PMC article.
-
Can Pay-for Performance Incentive Levels be Determined Using a Cost-Effectiveness Framework?Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Jul;13(7):e006492. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006492. Epub 2020 Jul 3. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020. PMID: 32615799 Free PMC article.
-
How are medical groups identified as high-performing? The effect of different approaches to classification of performance.BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 18;19(1):500. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4293-9. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019. PMID: 31319830 Free PMC article.
-
Pay for performance for hospitals.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 5;7(7):CD011156. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011156.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31276606 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grant support
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
