Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug;61(4):653-664.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2011.01028.x.

An extension of the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test for complex sample survey data

Affiliations

An extension of the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test for complex sample survey data

Sundar Natarajan et al. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2012 Aug.

Abstract

In complex survey sampling, a fraction of a finite population is sampled. Often, the survey is conducted so that each subject in the population has a different probability of being selected into the sample. Further, many complex surveys involve stratification and clustering. For generalizability of the sample to the finite population, these features of the design are usually incorporated in the analysis. While the Wilcoxon rank sum test is commonly used to compare an ordinal variable in bivariate analyses, no simple extension of the Wilcoxon rank sum test has been proposed for complex survey data. With multinomial sampling of independent subjects, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test statistic equals the score test statistic for the group effect from a proportional odds cumulative logistic regression model for an ordinal outcome. Using this regression framework, for complex survey data, we formulate a similar proportional odds cumulative logistic regression model for the ordinal variable, and use an estimating equations score statistic for no group effect as an extension of the Wilcoxon test. The proposed method is applied to a complex survey designed to produce national estimates of the health care use, expenditures, sources of payment, and insurance coverage.

Keywords: Cumulative logistic model; Medical Expenditure Panel Survey; Proportional odds model; Score statistic; Weighted estimating equations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agresti A. Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data. 2. New York: Wiley; 2010.
    1. Chambers RL, Skinner CJ. Analysis of Survey Data. New York: Wiley; 2003.
    1. Conover WJ. Practical Nonparametric Statistics. 3. New York: Wiley; 1998.
    1. Binder D. On the variance of asymptotically normal estimators from complex surveys. International Statistical Review. 1983;51:279–292.
    1. Bross IDJ. How to use ridit analysis. Biometrics. 1958;14:18–38.

LinkOut - more resources