Surgical checklists: a systematic review of impacts and implementation
- PMID: 23922403
- PMCID: PMC3963558
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001797
Surgical checklists: a systematic review of impacts and implementation
Abstract
Background: Surgical complications represent a significant cause of morbidity and mortality with the rate of major complications after inpatient surgery estimated at 3-17% in industrialised countries. The purpose of this review was to summarise experience with surgical checklist use and efficacy for improving patient safety.
Methods: A search of four databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Controlled Trials) was conducted from 1 January 2000 to 26 October 2012. Articles describing actual use of the WHO checklist, the Surgical Patient Safety System (SURPASS) checklist, a wrong-site surgery checklist or an anaesthesia equipment checklist were eligible for inclusion (this manuscript summarises all but the anaesthesia equipment checklists, which are described in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality publication).
Results: We included a total of 33 studies. We report a variety of outcomes including avoidance of adverse events, facilitators and barriers to implementation. Checklists have been adopted in a wide variety of settings and represent a promising strategy for improving the culture of patient safety and perioperative care in a wide variety of settings. Surgical checklists were associated with increased detection of potential safety hazards, decreased surgical complications and improved communication among operating staff. Strategies for successful checklist implementation included enlisting institutional leaders as local champions, incorporating staff feedback for checklist adaptation and avoiding redundancies with existing systems for collecting information.
Conclusions: Surgical checklists represent a relatively simple and promising strategy for addressing surgical patient safety worldwide. Further studies are needed to evaluate to what degree checklists improve clinical outcomes and whether improvements may be more pronounced in particular settings.
Keywords: Checklists; Patient Safety; Surgery; Teamwork.
Similar articles
-
Surgical safety checklists: a review.ANZ J Surg. 2014 Mar;84(3):148-54. doi: 10.1111/ans.12168. Epub 2013 Apr 18. ANZ J Surg. 2014. PMID: 23601094 Review.
-
Surgical safety checklists in developing countries.Int J Surg. 2014;12(5):2-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.10.016. Epub 2013 Nov 13. Int J Surg. 2014. PMID: 24239705 Review.
-
Impact of the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist on Patient Safety.Anesthesiology. 2019 Aug;131(2):420-425. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002674. Anesthesiology. 2019. PMID: 31090552 Review.
-
Validation of a Norwegian version of SURgical PAtient Safety System (SURPASS) in combination with the World Health Organizations' Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC).BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Jan 7;8(1):e000488. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000488. eCollection 2019. BMJ Open Qual. 2019. PMID: 30687799 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of the surgical safety checklist in correcting errors: a literature review applying Reason's Swiss cheese model.AORN J. 2014 Jul;100(1):65-79.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2013.07.024. AORN J. 2014. PMID: 24973186 Review.
Cited by
-
The Role of WHO Surgical Checklists in Reducing Postoperative Adverse Outcomes: A Systematic Review.Cureus. 2024 Oct 6;16(10):e70923. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70923. eCollection 2024 Oct. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39502999 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluating the Impact of the World Health Organization's Surgical Safety Checklist on Clinical Outcomes and Implementation Strategies: A Systematic Review.Cureus. 2024 Sep 21;16(9):e69875. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69875. eCollection 2024 Sep. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39435236 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist in resource-limited Somalia: a new standard in surgical safety.Patient Saf Surg. 2024 Oct 14;18(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13037-024-00410-2. Patient Saf Surg. 2024. PMID: 39402652 Free PMC article.
-
A Clinical Audit of Pregnancy Testing in Females Presenting With Abdominal Pain to the General Surgery Department of a District General Hospital.Cureus. 2024 Sep 21;16(9):e69834. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69834. eCollection 2024 Sep. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39308837 Free PMC article.
-
The strategic use of Big Data - A study protocol for a multicenter clinical trial testing if the use of the Swespine Dialogue Support alter outcomes in degenerative spine surgery.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Aug 21;25(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07714-5. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024. PMID: 39169349 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gawande AA, Thomas EJ, Zinner MJ, et al. The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992. Surgery 1999;126:66–75 - PubMed
-
- Kable AK, Gibberd RW, Spigelman AD. Adverse events in surgical patients in Australia. Int J Qual Health Care 2002;14:269–76 - PubMed
-
- Neily J, Mills PD, Young-Xu Y, et al. Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical mortality. JAMA 2010;304:1693–700 - PubMed
-
- Arriaga AF, Bader AM, Wong JM, et al. Simulation-based trial of surgical-crisis checklists. N Engl J Med 2013;368:246–53 - PubMed
-
- Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 2009;360:491–9 http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/NEJMsa0810119 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical