Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Oct;103(10):e13-26.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301491. Epub 2013 Aug 15.

Effectiveness of case management for homeless persons: a systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Effectiveness of case management for homeless persons: a systematic review

Renée de Vet et al. Am J Public Health. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

We reviewed the literature on standard case management (SCM), intensive case management (ICM), assertive community treatment (ACT), and critical time intervention (CTI) for homeless adults. We searched databases for peer-reviewed English articles published from 1985 to 2011 and found 21 randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies comparing case management to other services. We found little evidence for the effectiveness of ICM. SCM improved housing stability, reduced substance use, and removed employment barriers for substance users. ACT improved housing stability and was cost-effective for mentally ill and dually diagnosed persons. CTI showed promise for housing, psychopathology, and substance use and was cost-effective for mentally ill persons. More research is needed on how case management can most effectively support rapid-rehousing approaches to homelessness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1—
FIGURE 1—
Summary of database search and study selection in review of literature on models of case management for homeless adults, 1985–2011.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Toro PA, Tompsett CJ, Lombardo S et al. Homelessness in Europe and the United States: a comparison of prevalence and public opinion. J Soc Issues. 2007;63(3):505–524.
    1. Cortes A, Leopold J, Rothschild L, Buron L, Khadduri J, Culhane DP. The 2010 annual homeless assessment report to Congress. US Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2011. Available at: http://www.hudhre.info/documents/2010HomelessAssessmentReport.pdf. Accessed August 22, 2012.
    1. European Commission and European Federation of National Organisations Working with the Homeless. European Consensus Conference on Homelessness: policy recommendations of the jury. 2011. Available at: http://www.feantsa.org/files/freshstart/Consensus_Conference/Outcomes/20.... Accessed August 22, 2012.
    1. Lehman AF, Kernan E, DeForge BR, Dixon L. Effects of homelessness on the quality of life of persons with severe mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 1995;46(9):922–926. - PubMed
    1. Hubley AM, Russell LB, Palepu A, Hwang SW. Subjective quality of life among individuals who are homeless: a review of current knowledge. Soc Indic Res. 2012 Epub ahead of print February 3.

LinkOut - more resources