Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct;120(10):2109-16.
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.06.039. Epub 2013 Aug 14.

Prevalence of Myopia, Hyperopia, and Astigmatism in non-Hispanic White and Asian Children: Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Prevalence of Myopia, Hyperopia, and Astigmatism in non-Hispanic White and Asian Children: Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study

Ge Wen et al. Ophthalmology. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the age-, gender-, and ethnicity-specific prevalence of myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism in non-Hispanic white (NHW) and Asian preschool children.

Design: Population-based, cross-sectional study.

Participants: A population-based sample of 1501 NHW children and 1507 Asian children aged 6-72 months from Los Angeles County and Riverside County, California.

Methods: Eligible children underwent an in-home and in-clinic interview and a comprehensive eye examination including cycloplegic autorefraction from 100 census tracts.

Main outcome measures: The proportion of children with myopia (spherical equivalent [SE] ≤-1.00 diopter [D]), hyperopia (SE ≥ +2.00 D) and cylindrical refractive error ≥1.50 D in the worse eye. The astigmatism type was defined as with-the-rule (WTR; +cylinder axis 90°±15°) and against-the-rule (ATR; + cylinder axis 180°±15°); all other orientations were considered oblique (OBL).

Results: The prevalence of myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism in NHW children was 1.20% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76%-1.89%), 25.65% (95% CI, 23.5%-27.9%), and 6.33% (95% CI, 5.21%-7.68%), respectively. The prevalence of WTR, ATR, and OBL astigmatism in NHW children was 4.33%, 1.00%, and 1.00%, respectively. Prevalence was lower with older age groups for astigmatism (P = 0.0002), but not for myopia (P = 0.82) or hyperopia (P = 0.31). In Asian children, the prevalence of myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism was 3.98% (95% CI, 3.11%-5.09%), 13.47% (95% CI, 11.8%-15.3%), and 8.29% (95% CI, 7.01%-9.80%), respectively. The prevalence of WTR, ATR, and OBL astigmatism was 6.50%, 0.80%, and 1.00% respectively. The prevalence of hyperopia was higher in girls than boys (P = 0.0002), but no differences were found for myopia and astigmatism.

Conclusions: Hyperopia was the most common refractive error in both Asian and NHW children. However, compared with NHW children, myopia was relatively more prevalent, and hyperopia less prevalent, among Asian children. The prevalence of astigmatism was greatest in infants, and WTR astigmatism predominated at all ages. Myopia showed relatively stable prevalence across age groups, whereas hyperopia prevalence decreased after infancy and then increased again in older age groups; however, longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate refractive changes over time in individual children.

Financial disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of SE refractive error of the right eye stratified by level of refractive error, age, and ethnic group in the Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study (MEPEDS). Horizontal axis shows the SE refractive error in 1 Diopter intervals. SE: Spherical equivalent refractive error
Figure 2
Figure 2
Locally weighted regression lines derived for prevalence of myopia as a function of age in months for Non-Hispanic White and Asian children in the Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study. Vertical axis shows the estimated prevalence of myopia (SE <=−1.00 D) in the worse eye. Gray shading represent 95% confidence interval of the estimated prevalence. SE: Spherical equivalent refractive error; D: diopters
Figure 3
Figure 3
Locally weighted regression lines derived for prevalence of hyperopia as a function of age in months for Non-Hispanic White and Asian children in the Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study. Vertical axis shows the estimated prevalence of hyperopia (SE >=2.00 D) in the worse eye. Gray shading represent 95% confidence interval of the estimated prevalence. SE: Spherical equivalent refractive error; D: diopters
Figure 4
Figure 4
Locally weighted regression lines derived for prevalence of astigmatism as a function of age in months for Non-Hispanic White children in the Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study. Vertical axis shows the estimated prevalence of astigmatism >=1.50 D in the worse eye (CYL >=1.50 D). Gray shading represent 95% confidence interval of the estimated prevalence. CYL: cylindrical refractive error; D: diopters.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Locally weighted regression lines derived for prevalence of astigmatism as a function of age in months for Non-Hispanic White children in the Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study. Vertical axis shows the estimated prevalence of astigmatism >=3.00 D in the worse eye (CYL >=3.00 D). Gray shading represent 95% confidence interval of the estimated prevalence. CYL: cylindrical refractive error; D: diopters.

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 41 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

Feedback