Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul 31;2:364.
doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-364. eCollection 2013.

Barriers and Challenges in Integration of Anthroposophic Medicine in Supportive Breast Cancer Care

Free PMC article

Barriers and Challenges in Integration of Anthroposophic Medicine in Supportive Breast Cancer Care

Eran Ben-Arye et al. Springerplus. .
Free PMC article


In the last decade, more and more oncology centers are challenged with complementary medicine (CM) integration within supportive breast cancer care. Quality of life (QOL) improvement and attenuation of oncology treatment side effects are the core objectives of integrative CM programs in cancer care. Yet, limited research is available on the use of specific CM modalities in an integrative setting and on cancer patients' compliance with CM consultation. Studies are especially warranted to view the clinical application of researched CM modalities, such as anthroposophic medicine (AM), a unique CM modality oriented to cancer supportive care. Our objective was to characterize consultation patterns provided by physicians trained in CM following oncology health-care practitioners' referral of patients receiving chemotherapy. We aimed to identify characteristics of patients who consulted with AM and to explore patients' compliance to AM treatment. Of the 341 patients consulted with integrative physicians, 138 were diagnosed with breast cancer. Following integrative physician consultation, 56 patients were advised about AM treatment and 285 about other CM modalities. Logistic multivariate regression model found that, compared with patients receiving non-anthroposophic CM, the AM group had significantly greater rates of previous CM use [EXP(B) = 3.25, 95% C.I. 1.64-6.29, p = 0.001] and higher rates of cancer recurrence at baseline (p = 0.038). Most AM users (71.4%) used a single AM modality, such as mistletoe (viscum album) injections, oral AM supplements, or music therapy. Compliance with AM modalities following physician recommendation ranged from 44% to 71% of patients. We conclude that AM treatment provided within the integrative oncology setting is feasible based on compliance assessment. Other studies are warranted to explore the effectiveness of AM in improving patients' QOL during chemotherapy.

Keywords: Anthroposophic medicine; Cancer; Complementary medicine; Integrative medicine; Quality of life; Viscum album.


Figure 1
Figure 1
Integrative treatment goals (% of patients in each group).

Similar articles

See all similar articles


    1. Augustin M, Bock PR, Hanisch J, Karasmann M, Schneider B. Safety and efficacy of the long-term adjuvant treatment of primary intermediate- to high-risk malignant melanoma (UICC/AJCC stage II and III) with a standardized fermented European mistletoe (Viscum album L.) extract. Results from a multicenter, comparative, epidemiological cohort study in Germany and Switzerland. Arzneimittelforschung. 2005;55(1):38–49. - PubMed
    1. Bar-Sela G, Goldberg H, Beck D, Amit A, Kuten A. Reducing malignant ascites accumulation by repeated intraperitoneal administrations of a Viscum album extract. Anticancer Res. 2006;26(1B):709–713. - PubMed
    1. Bar-Sela G, Atid L, Danos S, Gabay N, Epelbaum R. Art therapy improved depression and influenced fatigue levels in cancer patients on chemotherapy. Psychooncology. 2007;16(11):980–984. doi: 10.1002/pon.1175. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ben-Arye E, Bar-Sela G, Frenkel M, Kuten A, Hermoni D. Is a biopsychosocial-spiritual approach relevant to cancer treatment? A study of patients and oncology staff members on issues of complementary medicine and spirituality. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14(2):147–152. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0866-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ben-Arye E, Schiff E, Shapira C, Frenkel M, Shalom T, Steiner M. Modeling an integrative oncology program within a community-centered oncology service in Israel. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;89(3):423–429. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.02.011. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources