Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison study
- PMID: 23963015
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a8212d
Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison study
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.
Objective: To compare midterm clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).
Summary of background data: Open TLIF is a proven technique to achieve fusion in symptomatic spinal deformities and instabilities. The possible advantages of MIS TLIF include reduced blood loss, less pain, and shorter hospitalization. To date, there is no published data comparing their midterm outcomes.
Methods: From 2004-2007, 40 cases of open TLIF were matched paired with 40 cases of MIS TLIF for age, sex, body mass index, and the levels on which the spine was operated. Oswestry Disability Index, neurogenic symptom score, the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and visual analogue scale scores for back and leg pain were obtained before surgery, 6 months, 2 years, and 5 years after surgery. Fusion rates were assessed using Bridwell classification.
Results: Fluoroscopic time (MIS: 55.2 s, open: 16.4 s, P < 0.001) was longer in MIS cases. Operative time (MIS: 185 min, open: 166 min, P = 0.085) was not significantly longer in MIS cases. MIS had less blood loss (127 mL) versus open (405 mL, P < 0.001) procedures. Morphine use for MIS cases (8.5 mg) was less compared with open (24.2 mg, P = 0.006). Patients who underwent MIS (1.5 d) ambulated earlier than those who underwent open fusion (3 d, P < 0.001). Patients who underwent MIS (3.6 d) had shorter hospitalization than those who underwent open fusion (5.9 d, P < 0.001). Both groups showed significant improvement in Oswestry Disability Index, neurogenic symptom score, back and leg pain, SF-36 scores at 6 months until 5 years with no significant differences between them. Grade 1 fusion was achieved in 97.5% of both groups at 5 years. The overall complication rate was 20% for the open group and 15% for MIS group (P = 0.774), including 4 cases of adjacent segment disease for each group.
Conclusion: MIS TLIF is comparable with open TLIF in terms of midterm clinical outcomes and fusion rates with the additional benefits of less initial postoperative pain, less blood loss, earlier rehabilitation, and shorter hospitalization.
Similar articles
-
Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jun 1;34(13):1385-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a4e3be. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009. PMID: 19478658
-
[Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Mar;27(3):262-7. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013. PMID: 23672121 Chinese.
-
Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.Eur Spine J. 2012 Nov;21(11):2265-70. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2281-4. Epub 2012 Mar 28. Eur Spine J. 2012. PMID: 22453894 Free PMC article.
-
Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Mar;24(3):416-27. doi: 10.3171/2015.2.SPINE14973. Epub 2015 Nov 13. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016. PMID: 26565767 Review.
-
Effect of minimally invasive technique on return to work and narcotic use following transforaminal lumbar inter-body fusion: a review.Prof Case Manag. 2012 Sep-Oct;17(5):229-35. doi: 10.1097/NCM.0b013e3182529c05. Prof Case Manag. 2012. PMID: 22850657 Review.
Cited by
-
Limited Intervention in Adult Scoliosis-A Systematic Review.J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 11;13(4):1030. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041030. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38398343 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bibliometric analysis of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: research status, trends, and future directions.EFORT Open Rev. 2023 Dec 1;8(12):906-918. doi: 10.1530/EOR-23-0155. EFORT Open Rev. 2023. PMID: 38038386 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy of gelatin-thrombin matrix sealants for blood loss in single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 8;102(36):e34667. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034667. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023. PMID: 37682173 Free PMC article.
-
Latest Developments in Minimally Invasive Spinal Treatment in Slovakia and Its Comparison with an Open Approach for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases.J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 18;12(14):4755. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144755. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37510873 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion in revision lumbar interbody fusion surgery.J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jul 13;18(1):497. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03972-6. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023. PMID: 37443066 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
