In response to Bairstow and Laszlo (1976) the present paper points out the inconsistencies of their arguments relative to Laszlo's previous work and that of Kelso, Stelmach, and Wanamaker (1974). Data are presented indicating that the nerve compression block, as a tool, fails to meet the stringent requirements necessary for examining motor performance in the absence of kinesthetic information. Some possibilities for the discrepancy between Laszlo's performance data and those from Kelso et al. are discussed. These hinge on the availability of sensory information rather than any artifact in the Kelso et al. nerve conduction procedures as Bairstow and Laszlo (1976) suggest.