The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): AMEE Guide No. 81. Part II: organisation & administration
- PMID: 23968324
- DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.818635
The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): AMEE Guide No. 81. Part II: organisation & administration
Abstract
The organisation, administration and running of a successful OSCE programme need considerable knowledge, experience and planning. Different teams looking after various aspects of OSCE need to work collaboratively for an effective question bank development, examiner training and standardised patients' training. Quality assurance is an ongoing process taking place throughout the OSCE cycle. In order for the OSCE to generate reliable results it is essential to pay attention to each and every element of quality assurance, as poorly standardised patients, untrained examiners, poor quality questions and inappropriate scoring rubrics each will affect the reliability of the OSCE. The validity will also be influenced if the questions are not realistic and mapped against the learning outcomes of the teaching programme. This part of the Guide addresses all these important issues in order to help the reader setup and quality assure their new or existing OSCE programmes.
Similar articles
-
The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): AMEE Guide No. 81. Part I: an historical and theoretical perspective.Med Teach. 2013 Sep;35(9):e1437-46. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.818634. Med Teach. 2013. PMID: 23968323
-
Experiences in adding multiple-choice questions to an objective structural clinical examination (OSCE) in undergraduate dental education.Eur J Dent Educ. 2012 Feb;16(1):e146-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2011.00689.x. Epub 2011 Apr 26. Eur J Dent Educ. 2012. PMID: 22251338
-
Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): review of literature and implications for nursing education.Nurse Educ Today. 2007 Jul;27(5):481-90. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.08.009. Epub 2006 Oct 27. Nurse Educ Today. 2007. PMID: 17070622 Review.
-
Objective structured clinical exams: a critical review.Fam Med. 2008 Sep;40(8):574-8. Fam Med. 2008. PMID: 18988044
-
Is the OSCE a feasible tool to assess competencies in undergraduate medical education?Med Teach. 2013 Jun;35(6):503-14. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.774330. Epub 2013 Mar 22. Med Teach. 2013. PMID: 23521582 Review.
Cited by
-
Beyond multiple choice: Clinical simulation as a rigorous and inclusive method for assessing genetic counseling competencies.J Genet Couns. 2024 Feb;33(1):118-123. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1878. Epub 2024 Feb 13. J Genet Couns. 2024. PMID: 38351603
-
Medical Education in Costa Rica. From Flexner to COVID-19: Integrative Answers for Old and New Challenges.Med Sci Educ. 2023 Sep 28;33(6):1389-1397. doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01886-w. eCollection 2023 Dec. Med Sci Educ. 2023. PMID: 38188383
-
Evaluation of an OSCE's implementation and a two-step approach for a theoretical and practical training program in Obstetrics and Gynecology.Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Dec 21;10:1263862. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1263862. eCollection 2023. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 38179276 Free PMC article.
-
An analysis of the effectiveness of reflective learning through watching videos recorded with smart glasses-With multiple views (student, patient, and overall) in radiography education.PLoS One. 2024 Jan 2;19(1):e0296417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296417. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38165849 Free PMC article.
-
Fully online OSCEs: A large cohort case study.MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Sep 30;9:214. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000214.1. eCollection 2020. MedEdPublish (2016). 2020. PMID: 38073825 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
