Comparative operative outcomes of early and delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a population-based propensity score analysis
- PMID: 23979286
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a5cf36
Comparative operative outcomes of early and delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a population-based propensity score analysis
Abstract
Objective: To compare the operative outcomes of early and delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.
Background: Randomized trials comparing early to delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis have limited contemporary external validity. Furthermore, no study to date has been large enough to assess the impact of timing of cholecystectomy on the frequency of serious rare complications including bile duct injury and death.
Methods: This is a population-based retrospective cohort study of patients emergently admitted to hospital with acute cholecystitis and managed with cholecystectomy over the period of April 1, 2004, to March 31, 2011. We used administrative records for the province of Ontario, Canada. Patients were divided into 2 exposure groups: those who underwent cholecystectomy within 7 days of emergency department presentation on index admission (early cholecystectomy) and those whose cholecystectomy was delayed. The primary outcome was major bile duct injury requiring operative repair within 6 months of cholecystectomy. Secondary outcomes included major bile duct injury or death, 30-day postcholecystectomy mortality, completion of cholecystectomy with an open approach, conversion among laparoscopic cases, and total hospital length of stay. Propensity score methods were used to address confounding by indication.
Results: From 22,202 patients, a well-balanced matched cohort of 14,220 patients was defined. Early cholecystectomy was associated with a lower risk of major bile duct injury [0.28% vs 0.53%, relative risk (RR)=0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-0.90], of major bile duct injury or death (1.36% vs 1.88%, RR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.56-0.94), and, albeit non-significant, of 30-day mortality (0.46% vs 0.64%, RR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.47-1.15). Total hospital length of stay was shorter with early cholecystectomy (mean difference 1.9 days, 95% CI: 1.7-2.1). No significant differences were observed in terms, open cholecystectomy (15% vs 14%, RR=1.07, 95% CI: 0.99-1.16) or in conversion among laparoscopic cases (11% vs 10%, RR=1.02, 95% CI: 0.93-1.13).
Conclusions: These results support the benefit of early overdelayed cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis.
Comment in
-
Patient value is superior with early surgery for acute cholecystitis.Ann Surg. 2014 Jan;259(1):16-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000428. Ann Surg. 2014. PMID: 24326747 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Early cholecystectomy (< 72 h) is associated with lower rate of complications and bile duct injury: a study of 109,862 cholecystectomies in the state of New York.Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):3051-3056. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07049-6. Epub 2019 Aug 2. Surg Endosc. 2020. PMID: 31376010
-
Evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis.Hepatogastroenterology. 2009 Jan-Feb;56(89):26-8. Hepatogastroenterology. 2009. PMID: 19453022
-
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis].G Chir. 2008 Jun-Jul;29(6-7):305-11. G Chir. 2008. PMID: 18544271 Italian.
-
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 30;(6):CD005440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005440.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23813477 Review.
-
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):CD005440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005440.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 30;(6):CD005440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005440.pub3 PMID: 17054258 Updated. Review.
Cited by
-
Safe postoperative outcomes following early cholecystectomy for acute calculus cholecystitis regardless of symptom onset.Turk J Surg. 2023 Dec 29;39(4):321-327. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.6165. eCollection 2023 Dec. Turk J Surg. 2023. PMID: 38694534 Free PMC article.
-
Liver pucker sign: predictor of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case series.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Apr 4;86(5):2442-2445. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002017. eCollection 2024 May. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024. PMID: 38694274 Free PMC article.
-
Early Management of Severe Biliary Infection in the Era of the Tokyo Guidelines.J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 16;12(14):4711. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144711. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37510826 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute calculous cholecystitis: a prospective, randomized study.J Minim Invasive Surg. 2022 Dec 15;25(4):139-144. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2022.25.4.139. J Minim Invasive Surg. 2022. PMID: 36601493 Free PMC article.
-
Timing of Elective Cholecystectomy After Acute Cholecystitis: A Population-based Register Study.World J Surg. 2023 Jan;47(1):152-161. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06772-x. Epub 2022 Oct 24. World J Surg. 2023. PMID: 36280615 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
