Advances in imaging and surveillance of AAA: when, how, how often?

Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 Jul-Aug;56(1):7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 Jul 9.

Abstract

Despite rapid technological developments for imaging the aorta, ultrasonography remains the method of choice for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening and surveillance. Randomised trials, conducted in the 20th century, have provided convincing evidence in favour of screening men at age 65 years, or older. However, in the 21st century the prevalence of aneurysms in 65 year old men has fallen by more than half, probably because of lower smoking prevalence and better cardiovascular risk prevention: screening or rescreening at an older age may be helpful. A recent meta-analysis has provided good evidence for surveillance intervals, with the majority of patients with screen-detected aneurysms (up to 4.5 cm diameter) being safely managed with 3-year surveillance intervals. Even for larger aneurysms, annual surveillance intervals are likely to be acceptable. This would reduce the number of surveillance visits by approximately half.

Keywords: AAA; Abdominal aortic aneurysm; CT; CTA; Growth; Imaging; Latitude; MASS; MRA; Multicentre Aneurysm Screen Study; Screening; Surveillance intervals; UK; US; United Kingdom; abdominal aortic aneurysm; computed tomographic angiography; computed tomography; magnetic resonance angiography; ultrasonography.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / diagnosis*
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / diagnostic imaging
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / epidemiology
  • Aortography
  • Diagnostic Imaging* / methods
  • Disease Progression
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mass Screening* / methods
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Selection
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prognosis
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Sex Factors
  • Time Factors
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Ultrasonography