Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct;22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii65-ii72.
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001713. Epub 2013 Aug 30.

Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change

Pat Croskerry et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct.
Free PMC article

Abstract

In a companion paper, we proposed that cognitive debiasing is a skill essential in developing sound clinical reasoning to mitigate the incidence of diagnostic failure. We reviewed the origins of cognitive biases and some proposed mechanisms for how debiasing processes might work. In this paper, we first outline a general schema of how cognitive change occurs and the constraints that may apply. We review a variety of individual factors, many of them biases themselves, which may be impediments to change. We then examine the major strategies that have been developed in the social sciences and in medicine to achieve cognitive and affective debiasing, including the important concept of forcing functions. The abundance and rich variety of approaches that exist in the literature and in individual clinical domains illustrate the difficulties inherent in achieving cognitive change, and also the need for such interventions. Ongoing cognitive debiasing is arguably the most important feature of the critical thinker and the well-calibrated mind. We outline three groups of suggested interventions going forward: educational strategies, workplace strategies and forcing functions. We stress the importance of ambient and contextual influences on the quality of individual decision making and the need to address factors known to impair calibration of the decision maker. We also emphasise the importance of introducing these concepts and corollary development of training in critical thinking in the undergraduate level in medical education.

Keywords: Cognitive Biases; Decision Making; Diagnostic Errors; Patient Safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Transtheoretical model of change.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Croskerry P, Singhal G, Mamede S. Cognitive debiasing 1: origins of bias and theory of debiasing. 2013;0:1–7. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001712 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Newell BR, Wong KY, Cheung JCH, et al. Think, blink or sleep on it? The impact of modes of thought on complex decision making. Q J Exp Psychol 2009;62:707–32 - PubMed
    1. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change. Am Psychol 1992;47:1102–4 - PubMed
    1. De Neys W, Moyens E, Vansteenwegen D. Feeling we're biased: autonomic arousal and reasoning conflict. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2010;10:208–16 - PubMed
    1. Wilson TD, Brekke N. Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychol Bull 1994;116:117–42 - PubMed