Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct;71(5 Suppl):38S-64S.
doi: 10.1177/1077558713496321. Epub 2013 Sep 1.

Complexity, public reporting, and choice of doctors: a look inside the blackest box of consumer behavior

Affiliations

Complexity, public reporting, and choice of doctors: a look inside the blackest box of consumer behavior

Mark Schlesinger et al. Med Care Res Rev. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Health care consumers often make choices that are imperfectly informed and inconsistent with their expressed preferences. Past research suggests that these shortcomings become more pronounced as choices become more complex, through either additional options or more performance metrics. But it is unclear why this is true: Consumer choice remains a "black box" that research has scarcely illuminated. In this article, we identify four pathways through which complexity may impair consumer choice. We examine these pathways using data from an experiment in which consumers (hypothetically) selected a primary care physician. Some of the loss of decision quality accompanying more complex choice sets can be explained by consumers' skills and decision-making style, but even after accounting for these factors, complexity undermines the quality of decision making in ways that cannot be fully explained. We conclude by discussing implications for report designers, sponsors, and policy makers aspiring to promote consumer empowerment and health care quality.

Keywords: bounded rationality; choice; consumerism; decision styles; experiment; heuristics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Possible choice pathways linking complex choice sets to impaired consumer choice.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Screenshot of performance overview page on SelectMD website: Arm 4.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Design for Select MD experiment. Note: CAHPS = Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems; HEDIS = Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Complexity of choice sets and quality of decision making.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Filtering choice sets and quality of decision making.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Excessively maximizing decision makers: Complexity and quality of decision making.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson C. The psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological Bulletin. 2003;129:139–166. - PubMed
    1. Barnes AJ, Hanoch Y, Wood S, Liu PJ, Rice T. One fish, two fish, red fish, blue fish: Effects of price frames, brand names, and choice set size on Medicare Part D insurance plan decisions. Medical Care Research and Review. 2012;69:460–473. - PubMed
    1. Begley S. I can’t think! Newsweek. 2011 Feb 27; Retrieved from http://www.newsweek.com/2011/02/27/i-can-t-think.print.html.
    1. Bruine de Bruin W, Parker A, Fischhoff B. Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2007;92:938–956. - PubMed
    1. Bundorf KM, Szrek H. Choice set size and decision making: The case of Medicare Part D prescription drug plans. Medical Decision Making. 2010;30:582–593. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types