Push back to respond better: regulatory inhibition of the DNA double-strand break response
- PMID: 24002223
- DOI: 10.1038/nrm3659
Push back to respond better: regulatory inhibition of the DNA double-strand break response
Abstract
Single DNA lesions such as DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can cause cell death or trigger genome rearrangements that have oncogenic potential, and so the pathways that mend and signal DNA damage must be highly sensitive but, at the same time, selective and reversible. When initiated, boundaries must be set to restrict the DSB response to the site of the lesion. The integration of positive and, crucially, negative control points involving post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation, ubiquitylation and acetylation is key for building fast, effective responses to DNA damage and for mitigating the impact of DNA lesions on genome integrity.
Similar articles
-
The relationship between histone posttranslational modification and DNA damage signaling and repair.Int J Radiat Biol. 2019 Apr;95(4):382-393. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2018.1516911. Epub 2018 Sep 25. Int J Radiat Biol. 2019. PMID: 30252564
-
Histone modifications and the DNA double-strand break response.Cell Cycle. 2018;17(21-22):2399-2410. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2018.1542899. Epub 2018 Nov 14. Cell Cycle. 2018. PMID: 30394812 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Chromatin remodeling finds its place in the DNA double-strand break response.Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Apr;37(5):1363-77. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn1071. Epub 2009 Jan 12. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009. PMID: 19139074 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assembly and function of DNA double-strand break repair foci in mammalian cells.DNA Repair (Amst). 2010 Dec 10;9(12):1219-28. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.010. Epub 2010 Oct 28. DNA Repair (Amst). 2010. PMID: 21035408 Review.
-
Histone modifications and DNA double-strand break repair after exposure to ionizing radiations.Radiat Res. 2013 Apr;179(4):383-92. doi: 10.1667/RR3308.2. Epub 2013 Feb 1. Radiat Res. 2013. PMID: 23373901 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Interplay between Ubiquitin, SUMO, and Poly(ADP-Ribose) in the Cellular Response to Genotoxic Stress.Front Genet. 2016 Apr 19;7:63. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2016.00063. eCollection 2016. Front Genet. 2016. PMID: 27148359 Free PMC article. Review.
-
JMJD6 modulates DNA damage response through downregulating H4K16ac independently of its enzymatic activity.Cell Death Differ. 2020 Mar;27(3):1052-1066. doi: 10.1038/s41418-019-0397-3. Epub 2019 Jul 29. Cell Death Differ. 2020. PMID: 31358914 Free PMC article.
-
Pan-cancer analysis reveals synergistic effects of CDK4/6i and PARPi combination treatment in RB-proficient and RB-deficient breast cancer cells.Cell Death Dis. 2020 Apr 6;11(4):219. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2408-1. Cell Death Dis. 2020. PMID: 32249776 Free PMC article.
-
Role of protein phosphatases PP1, PP2A, PP4 and Cdc14 in the DNA damage response.Cell Stress. 2019 Feb 21;3(3):70-85. doi: 10.15698/cst2019.03.178. Cell Stress. 2019. PMID: 31225502 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nucleosome acidic patch promotes RNF168- and RING1B/BMI1-dependent H2AX and H2A ubiquitination and DNA damage signaling.PLoS Genet. 2014 Mar 6;10(3):e1004178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004178. eCollection 2014 Mar. PLoS Genet. 2014. PMID: 24603765 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
