Color-blind racial ideology: theory, training, and measurement implications in psychology

Am Psychol. 2013 Sep;68(6):455-66. doi: 10.1037/a0033282.

Abstract

Synthesizing the interdisciplinary literature, we characterize color-blind racial ideology (CBRI) as consisting of two interrelated domains: color-evasion (i.e., denial of racial differences by emphasizing sameness) and power-evasion (i.e., denial of racism by emphasizing equal opportunities). Mounting empirical data suggest that the color-evasion dimension is ineffective and in fact promotes interracial tension and potential inequality. CBRI may be conceived as an ultramodern or contemporary form of racism and a legitimizing ideology used to justify the racial status quo. Four types of CBRI are described: denial of (a) race, (b) blatant racial issues, (c) institutional racism, and (d) White privilege. We discuss empirical findings suggesting a relationship between CBRI and increased racial prejudice, racial anger, and racial fear. Implications for education, training, and research are provided.

MeSH terms

  • Asian
  • Black or African American
  • Cultural Diversity*
  • Culture
  • Denial, Psychological
  • Health Status Disparities
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • Humans
  • Indians, North American
  • Power, Psychological*
  • Racism / psychology*
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • United States
  • White People