Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct;258(4):619-26; discussion 626-7.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a5025a.

RAS Mutation Status Predicts Survival and Patterns of Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases

Affiliations
Free PMC article

RAS Mutation Status Predicts Survival and Patterns of Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases

Jean-Nicolas Vauthey et al. Ann Surg. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objective: To determine the impact of RAS mutation status on survival and patterns of recurrence in patients undergoing curative resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) after preoperative modern chemotherapy.

Background: RAS mutation has been reported to be associated with aggressive tumor biology. However, the effect of RAS mutation on survival and patterns of recurrence after resection of CLM remains unclear.

Methods: Somatic mutations were analyzed using mass spectroscopy in 193 patients who underwent single-regimen modern chemotherapy before resection of CLM. The relationship between RAS mutation status and survival outcomes was investigated.

Results: Detected somatic mutations included RAS (KRAS/NRAS) in 34 (18%), PIK3CA in 13 (7%), and BRAF in 2 (1%) patients. At a median follow-up of 33 months, 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 81% in patients with wild-type versus 52.2% in patients with mutant RAS (P = 0.002); 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 33.5% with wild-type versus 13.5% with mutant RAS (P = 0.001). Liver and lung recurrences were observed in 89 and 83 patients, respectively. Patients with RAS mutation had a lower 3-year lung RFS rate (34.6% vs 59.3%, P < 0.001) but not a lower 3-year liver RFS rate (43.8% vs 50.2%, P = 0.181). In multivariate analyses, RAS mutation predicted worse OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.3, P = 0.002), overall RFS (HR = 1.9, P = 0.005), and lung RFS (HR = 2.0, P = 0.01), but not liver RFS (P = 0.181).

Conclusions: RAS mutation predicts early lung recurrence and worse survival after curative resection of CLM. This information may be used to individualize systemic and local tumor-directed therapies and follow-up strategies.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest The authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Selection of study population.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Somatic gene mutations.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Overall survival (OS) (A) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (B) according to RAS mutation status.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Lung (A) and liver (B) recurrence-free survival (RFS) according to RAS mutation status.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 77 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

MeSH terms

Feedback