[Learning success of students in surgery with a multimedia-based manual. A prospective randomized trial]

Chirurg. 2013 Oct;84(10):875-80. doi: 10.1007/s00104-013-2529-5.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Background: Teaching surgery to students means covering two main learning fields: theoretical knowledge and practical skills. The objective of this study was to compare a multimedia-based surgical procedure manual to a text-based one in a student population.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial in a pre-post-retention test design was conducted online with the participation of 101 medical students. Subjects studied the performance of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy either in a multimedia-based (MMG) or text-based (TG) presentation. The post-test surveyed the knowledge gain and 3 months later a retention test assessed the sustainability of that knowledge.

Results: The study showed a significant knowledge gain in the intragroup comparison. Regarding the procedural knowledge, the MMG scored significantly higher in Δpost-test with 3.84 (MMG) vs 2.98 (TG) correct answers (p = 0.040). This finding was confirmed in the retention test. The MMG (7.17) scored overall significantly higher than the TG (6.41) with correct answers (p = 0.028).

Conclusions: Multimedia-based learning can be regarded as an alternative to text-based learning. Students learn factual knowledge equally well with both devices but the MMG scored higher in procedural and more complex knowledge.

Publication types

  • English Abstract
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / education*
  • Clinical Competence*
  • Computer-Assisted Instruction
  • Curriculum
  • Educational Measurement
  • General Surgery / education*
  • Germany
  • Humans
  • Manuals as Topic*
  • Multimedia*
  • Software