Panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer
- PMID: 24024839
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1305275
Panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer
Abstract
Background: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer that harbors KRAS mutations in exon 2 do not benefit from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy. Other activating RAS mutations may also be negative predictive biomarkers for anti-EGFR therapy.
Methods: In this prospective-retrospective analysis, we assessed the efficacy and safety of panitumumab plus oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) as compared with FOLFOX4 alone, according to RAS (KRAS or NRAS) or BRAF mutation status. A total of 639 patients who had metastatic colorectal cancer without KRAS mutations in exon 2 had results for at least one of the following: KRAS exon 3 or 4; NRAS exon 2, 3, or 4; or BRAF exon 15. The overall rate of ascertainment of RAS status was 90%.
Results: Among 512 patients without RAS mutations, progression-free survival was 10.1 months with panitumumab-FOLFOX4 versus 7.9 months with FOLFOX4 alone (hazard ratio for progression or death with combination therapy, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.90; P=0.004). Overall survival was 26.0 months in the panitumumab-FOLFOX4 group versus 20.2 months in the FOLFOX4-alone group (hazard ratio for death, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.99; P=0.04). A total of 108 patients (17%) with nonmutated KRAS exon 2 had other RAS mutations. These mutations were associated with inferior progression-free survival and overall survival with panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment, which was consistent with the findings in patients with KRAS mutations in exon 2. BRAF mutations were a negative prognostic factor. No new safety signals were identified.
Conclusions: Additional RAS mutations predicted a lack of response in patients who received panitumumab-FOLFOX4. In patients who had metastatic colorectal cancer without RAS mutations, improvements in overall survival were observed with panitumumab-FOLFOX4 therapy. (Funded by Amgen and others; PRIME ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00364013.).
Comment in
-
Beyond exon 2--the developing story of RAS mutations in colorectal cancer.N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 12;369(11):1059-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1307992. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 24024844 No abstract available.
-
RAS mutations in colorectal cancer.N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 28;369(22):2159-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1312697. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 24283232 No abstract available.
-
RAS mutations in colorectal cancer.N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 28;369(22):2159. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1312697. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 24283233 No abstract available.
-
[RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer].Z Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep;52(9):1095-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1384878. Epub 2014 Sep 8. Z Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 25198090 German. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study.J Clin Oncol. 2010 Nov 1;28(31):4697-705. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.4860. Epub 2010 Oct 4. J Clin Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20921465 Clinical Trial.
-
FOLFOX4 Plus Cetuximab for Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer According to Tumor RAS and BRAF Mutation Status: Updated Analysis of the CECOG/CORE 1.2.002 Study.Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2015 Jun;14(2):91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 24. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2015. PMID: 25666295 Clinical Trial.
-
Analysis of KRAS/NRAS Mutations in a Phase III Study of Panitumumab with FOLFIRI Compared with FOLFIRI Alone as Second-line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Dec 15;21(24):5469-79. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0526. Epub 2015 Sep 4. Clin Cancer Res. 2015. PMID: 26341920 Clinical Trial.
-
The predictive value of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and PTEN for anti-EGFR treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta Oncol. 2014 Jul;53(7):852-64. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.895036. Epub 2014 Mar 25. Acta Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24666267 Review.
-
Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: can testing of tumor tissue for mutations in EGFR pathway downstream effector genes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer improve health outcomes by guiding decisions regarding anti-EGFR therapy?Genet Med. 2013 Jul;15(7):517-27. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.184. Epub 2013 Feb 21. Genet Med. 2013. PMID: 23429431
Cited by
-
Using Genomic Heterogeneity to Inform Therapeutic Decisions for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Application of the Value of Heterogeneity Framework.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 Nov 9. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00926-9. Online ahead of print. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024. PMID: 39520611
-
Proteomic study of medicinal mushroom extracts reveals antitumor mechanisms in an advanced colon cancer animal model via ribosomal biogenesis, translation, and metabolic pathways.Front Pharmacol. 2024 Oct 18;15:1475102. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1475102. eCollection 2024. Front Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 39494346 Free PMC article.
-
Signaling pathways involved in colorectal cancer: pathogenesis and targeted therapy.Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024 Oct 7;9(1):266. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01953-7. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024. PMID: 39370455 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Successful cetuximab rechallenge in metastatic colorectal cancer: A case report.World J Clin Oncol. 2024 Sep 24;15(9):1232-1238. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i9.1232. World J Clin Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39351455 Free PMC article.
-
Targeted therapy guided by circulating tumor DNA analysis in advanced gastrointestinal tumors.Nat Med. 2024 Sep 16. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03244-8. Online ahead of print. Nat Med. 2024. PMID: 39284955
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous