Trends over time in the relative use and associated mortality of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in the Veterans Affairs system
- PMID: 24026109
- DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3580
Trends over time in the relative use and associated mortality of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in the Veterans Affairs system
Abstract
Importance: Numerous studies have compared the results of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), but little is known about how either the relative use of these procedures or their associated perioperative mortality have changed with time.
Objective: To examine trends in off- and on-pump CABG use and outcomes over time.
Design: Retrospective analysis of data from the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP).
Setting: Data were collected from 42 Veterans Affairs cardiac surgery centers.
Participants: All Veterans Affairs patients (n = 65,097) who underwent isolated primary CABG from October 1997 to April 2011.
Interventions: Patients underwent either on-pump (ON) or off-pump (OFF) CABG.
Main outcomes and measures: The percentages of ON vs OFF cases as a function of time. We also evaluated trends over time in rates of conversion from OFF to ON CABG, perioperative mortality (30-day or in-hospital), and VASQIP predicted risk of mortality.
Results: The relative use of OFF CABG peaked at 24% in 2003, followed by a slow and mostly consistent decline to stabilize at about 19%. The conversion rate decreased with time and has stayed less than 3.5% since 2007 (P < .001). Perioperative mortality rates decreased over time for both ON and OFF CABG (P < .001) and have stayed less than 2% for the entire cohort since 2006. The mortality associated with converted cases was high regardless of the surgery year and exceeded the VASQIP predicted risk of mortality.
Conclusions and relevance: There has been a decline in the relative use of OFF CABG in the Veterans Affairs system since 2003. This trend may affect the training of future generations in OFF surgery and influence conversion rates and outcomes.
Comment in
-
On- or off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: how are you trending?JAMA Surg. 2013 Nov;148(11):1036. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3610. JAMA Surg. 2013. PMID: 24026708 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Changes over time in risk profiles of patients who undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP).JAMA Surg. 2015 Apr;150(4):308-15. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1700. JAMA Surg. 2015. PMID: 25671647
-
Short-term clinical outcomes after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting at a single Veterans Affairs Medical Center.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 May 17;11(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13019-016-0480-5. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016. PMID: 27185173 Free PMC article.
-
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery have a beneficial effect on long-term mortality and morbidity compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Jul;19(1):149-59. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu075. Epub 2014 Mar 21. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014. PMID: 24659552 Review.
-
A study design to assess the safety and efficacy of on-pump versus off-pump coronary bypass grafting: the ROOBY trial.Clin Trials. 2007;4(1):81-91. doi: 10.1177/1740774506075859. Clin Trials. 2007. PMID: 17327248 Clinical Trial.
-
Perioperative outcomes in hybrid versus conventional surgical coronary artery revascularisation.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Sep;11(3):292-6. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.239178. Epub 2010 Jun 23. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010. PMID: 20573651 Review.
Cited by
-
Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Department of Veteran Affairs' Use and Outcomes.J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Mar 15;11(6):e023514. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023514. Epub 2022 Mar 1. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35229663 Free PMC article.
-
Thirty-day Outcomes of On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: an Analysis of a Brazilian Sample by Propensity Score Matching.Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Mar 10;37(1):1-6. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0229. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2022. PMID: 35072394 Free PMC article.
-
Initiation and modification of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Apr;67(4):349-354. doi: 10.1007/s11748-018-1050-7. Epub 2018 Dec 19. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019. PMID: 30569257 Review.
-
Comparing Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Among Large Teaching and Urban Hospitals in China and the United States.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Jun;10(6):e003327. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003327. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017. PMID: 28611187 Free PMC article.
-
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Misperceptions and misconceptions.World J Methodol. 2014 Mar 26;4(1):6-10. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v4.i1.6. eCollection 2014 Mar 26. World J Methodol. 2014. PMID: 25237626 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
