Comparative effectiveness of new oral anticoagulants and standard thromboprophylaxis in patients having total hip or knee replacement: a systematic review
- PMID: 24026260
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-4-201308200-00008
Comparative effectiveness of new oral anticoagulants and standard thromboprophylaxis in patients having total hip or knee replacement: a systematic review
Abstract
Background: Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis reduces the risk for venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR). New oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors, are emerging options for thromboprophylaxis after these procedures.
Purpose: To compare the benefits and risks of NOACs versus standard thromboprophylaxis for adults having THR or TKR.
Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from January 2009 through March 2013.
Study selection: English-language systematic reviews.
Data extraction: Two independent reviewers abstracted data and rated study quality and strength of evidence.
Data synthesis: Six good-quality systematic reviews compared NOACs with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for thromboprophylaxis after THR or TKR. Risk for symptomatic deep venous thrombosis, but not risk for death or nonfatal pulmonary embolism, was reduced with factor Xa inhibitors compared with LMWH (4 fewer events per 1000 patients). Conversely, the risk for major bleeding increased (2 more events per 1000 patients). Outcomes of dabigatran did not significantly differ from those of LMWH. Indirect evaluation of NOACs by common comparison with LMWH showed nonsignificantly reduced risks for venous thromboembolism with rivaroxaban compared with dabigatran (risk ratio [RR], 0.68 [95% CI, 0.21 to 2.23]) and apixaban (RR, 0.59 [CI, 0.26 to 1.33]) but increased major bleeding. New oral anticoagulants have not been compared with warfarin, aspirin, or unfractionated heparin.
Limitations: Head-to-head comparisons among NOACs were not available. Efficacy is uncertain in routine clinical practice.
Conclusion: New oral anticoagulants are effective for thromboprophylaxis after THR and TKR. Their clinical benefits over LMWH are marginal and offset by increased risk for major bleeding.
Primary funding source: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
Comment in
-
ACP Journal Club. Review: new oral factor Xa inhibitors reduce DVT compared with standard thromboprophylaxis after THR or TKR.Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jan 21;160(2):JC3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-160-2-201401210-02003. Ann Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24445713 No abstract available.
-
Adding lisinopril to losartan increased hyperkalemia and acute kidney injury in type 2 diabetes and proteinuria.Ann Intern Med. 2014 Mar 18;160(6):JC3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-160-6-201403180-02003. Ann Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24638181 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Oral direct Factor Xa inhibitors versus low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 15;156(10):710-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-10-201205150-00421. Epub 2012 Mar 12. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22412038 Review.
-
Low molecular weight heparin versus other anti-thrombotic agents for prevention of venous thromboembolic events after total hip or total knee replacement surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Sep 8;19(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2215-3. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018. PMID: 30193575 Free PMC article.
-
Factor Xa Inhibitors and Direct Thrombin Inhibitors Versus Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Thromboprophylaxis After Total Hip or Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Arthroplasty. 2019 Apr;34(4):789-800.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.11.029. Epub 2018 Dec 1. J Arthroplasty. 2019. PMID: 30685261
-
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 18;12(12):CD008500. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008500.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33337539 Free PMC article.
-
Direct thrombin inhibitors versus vitamin K antagonists or low molecular weight heparins for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Apr 14;2010(4):CD005981. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005981.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010. PMID: 20393944 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Being precise with anticoagulation to reduce adverse drug reactions: are we there yet?Pharmacogenomics J. 2024 Mar 5;24(2):7. doi: 10.1038/s41397-024-00329-y. Pharmacogenomics J. 2024. PMID: 38443337 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Major Orthopedic Surgeries and Factor XIa Inhibitors.Med Sci (Basel). 2023 Aug 11;11(3):49. doi: 10.3390/medsci11030049. Med Sci (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37606428 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Lack of alignment between orthopaedic surgeon priorities and patient expectations in total joint arthroplasty.Patient Saf Surg. 2023 Jun 29;17(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13037-023-00365-w. Patient Saf Surg. 2023. PMID: 37386583 Free PMC article.
-
CRISTAL (a cluster-randomised, crossover, non-inferiority trial of aspirin compared to low molecular weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hip or knee arthroplasty, a registry nested study): statistical analysis plan.Trials. 2021 Aug 24;22(1):564. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05486-0. Trials. 2021. PMID: 34429127 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Prevention of thromboembolism in spinal cord injury -S1 guideline.Neurol Res Pract. 2020 Dec 10;2:43. doi: 10.1186/s42466-020-00089-7. eCollection 2020. Neurol Res Pract. 2020. PMID: 33324943 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical