Conservation, spillover and gene flow within a network of Northern European marine protected areas

PLoS One. 2013 Sep 6;8(9):e73388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073388. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

To ensure that marine protected areas (MPAs) benefit conservation and fisheries, the effectiveness of MPA designs has to be evaluated in field studies. Using an interdisciplinary approach, we empirically assessed the design of a network of northern MPAs where fishing for European lobster (Homarusgammarus) is prohibited. First, we demonstrate a high level of residency and survival (50%) for almost a year (363 days) within MPAs, despite small MPA sizes (0.5-1 km(2)). Second, we demonstrate limited export (4.7%) of lobsters tagged within MPAs (N = 1810) to neighbouring fished areas, over a median distance of 1.6 km out to maximum 21 km away from MPA centres. In comparison, median movement distance of lobsters recaptured within MPAs was 164 m, and recapture rate was high (40%). Third, we demonstrate a high level of gene flow within the study region, with an estimated F ST of less than 0.0001 over a ≈ 400 km coastline. Thus, the restricted movement of older life stages, combined with a high level of gene flow suggests that connectivity is primarily driven by larval drift. Larval export from the MPAs can most likely affect areas far beyond their borders. Our findings are of high importance for the design of MPA networks for sedentary species with pelagic early life stages.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Conservation of Natural Resources*
  • Ecosystem
  • Europe
  • Gene Flow
  • Movement
  • Nephropidae / genetics
  • Nephropidae / physiology*
  • Population Dynamics

Grants and funding

Field work was financed by the Norwegian Institute of Marine Research (www.imr.no) through the Coastal Zone Ecosystem Program and the European Union and the Norwegian government through the ‘INTERREG III A’ program (www.interreg-sverige-norge.com). Preparation of this manuscript was supported by the Research Council of Norway (www.forskningsradet.no), the Research Council of Sweden, through the Center for evolutionary Marine Biology, and the Regional Research Fund Agder. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.