Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Oct;61(10):1705-13.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.12440. Epub 2013 Sep 19.

Turning for Ulcer ReductioN: a multisite randomized clinical trial in nursing homes

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Turning for Ulcer ReductioN: a multisite randomized clinical trial in nursing homes

Nancy Bergstrom et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Oct.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: To determine optimal repositioning frequency of nursing home (NH) residents at risk for pressure ulcers (PrUs) when cared for on high-density foam mattresses.

Design: Multisite, randomized, clinical trial, known as Turning for Ulcer ReductioN (TURN Study).

Settings: NHs in the United States (n = 20) and Canada (n = 7) using high-density foam mattresses.

Participants: Consenting residents (N = 942) aged 65 and older without PrUs at moderate (scores 13-14) or high (scores 10-12) risk of PrUs according to the Braden Scale.

Intervention: Participants were randomly allocated using risk stratification (moderate vs high) to a repositioning schedule (2, 3, or 4 hour) for 3 weeks. Blinded assessors assessed skin weekly.

Measurements: PrU incidence (coccyx or sacrum, trochanter, heels).

Results: Participants were mostly female (77.6%) and Caucasian (80.5%) and had a mean age of 85.1 ± 7.7. The most common diagnoses were cardiovascular (76.9%) and dementia (72.5%). Nineteen (2.0%) participants developed superficial PrUs. There was no significant difference (Wilcoxon test for ordered categories) in PrU incidence (P = .68) according to repositioning group (2 hour, 8/321, 2.5%; 3 hour, 2/326, 0.6%; 4 hour, 9/295, 3.1%), nor was there a statistically significant difference in the incidence of PrU between the high and moderate-risk groups (P = .79). Also, PrU incidence was not statistically significantly different between high-risk participants based on repositioning schedule (6/325, 1.8%, P = .90) or between moderate-risk participants based on repositioning schedule (13/617, 2.1%, P = .68).

Conclusion: There was no difference in PrU incidence over 3 weeks of observation between those turned at 2-, 3-, or 4-hour intervals in this population of residents using high-density foam mattresses at moderate and high risk of developing PrUs when they were repositioned consistently and skin was monitored. This finding has major implications for use of nursing staff and cost of NH care.

Keywords: Turning for Ulcer ReductioN Study; nursing home; pressure ulcer prevention; repositioning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources