A national survey of radiation oncologists and urologists on recommendations of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer
- PMID: 24053213
- PMCID: PMC4353641
- DOI: 10.1111/bju.12422
A national survey of radiation oncologists and urologists on recommendations of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer
Abstract
Objective: To assess recommendations for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in a national survey of radiation oncologists and urologists following the recent USA Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) grade D recommendation.
Methods: A random sample of 1366 radiation oncologists and urologists were identified from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. From November 2011 to April 2012, a mail survey was sent to query PSA screening recommendations for men at average risk of prostate cancer for the following age groups: 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-74, 75-79 and ≥80 years. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test for differences in PSA-based screening recommendations by physician characteristics.
Results: Response rates were similar at 52% for radiation oncologists and urologists (P = 0.92). Overall, 51.5% of respondents recommended PSA-based screening for men aged 40-49 years, while nearly all endorsed it for those aged 50-74 years (96.1% for 50-59, 97.3% for 60-69, and 87.7% for 70-74 years). However, screening recommendations decreased to 43.9% and 12.8% for men aged 75-79 and ≥80 years, respectively. On multivariable analysis, urologists were more likely to recommend screening for men aged 40-49 (odds ratio [OR] 3.09; P < 0.001) and 50-59 years (OR 3.81; P = 0.01), but less likely for men aged 75-79 (OR 0.66; P = 0.01) and ≥80 years (OR 0.45; P = 0.002) compared with radiation oncologists.
Conclusion: While radiation oncologists and urologists recommended PSA screening for men aged 50-69 years, there was less agreement about screening for younger (40-49 years old) and older (≥70 years) men at average risk for prostate cancer.
Keywords: outcomes; prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen; screening; survey.
© 2013 The Authors. BJU International © 2013 BJU International.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
The effect of the USPSTF PSA screening recommendation on prostate cancer incidence patterns in the USA.Nat Rev Urol. 2017 Jan;14(1):26-37. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.251. Epub 2016 Dec 20. Nat Rev Urol. 2017. PMID: 27995937 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A National Survey of Radiation Oncologists and Urologists on Perceived Attitudes and Recommendations of Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Jun;17(3):e472-e481. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Feb 7. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019. PMID: 30827923
-
United States radiation oncologists' and urologists' opinions about screening and treatment of prostate cancer vary by region.Urology. 2002 Oct;60(4):628-33. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01832-0. Urology. 2002. PMID: 12385923
-
Comparison of recommendations by urologists and radiation oncologists for treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.JAMA. 2000 Jun 28;283(24):3217-22. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.24.3217. JAMA. 2000. PMID: 10866869
-
The role of androgen ablation in patients with biochemical or local failure after definitive radiation therapy: a survey of practice patterns of urologists and radiation oncologists in the United States.Urology. 2001 Aug;58(2 Suppl 1):65-70. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01244-4. Urology. 2001. PMID: 11502452 Review.
Cited by
-
Trends in Incidence of Metastatic Prostate Cancer in the US.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e222246. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2246. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 35285916 Free PMC article.
-
All change in the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway.Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020 Jun;17(6):372-381. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-0332-z. Epub 2020 Feb 28. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32112055 Review.
-
Personal prostate-specific antigen screening and treatment choices for localized prostate cancer among expert physicians.Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 Feb;12(2):E59-E63. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4736. Epub 2017 Dec 1. Can Urol Assoc J. 2018. PMID: 29381460 Free PMC article.
-
Nanoparticles as Theranostic Vehicles in Experimental and Clinical Applications-Focus on Prostate and Breast Cancer.Int J Mol Sci. 2017 May 20;18(5):1102. doi: 10.3390/ijms18051102. Int J Mol Sci. 2017. PMID: 28531102 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The effect of the USPSTF PSA screening recommendation on prostate cancer incidence patterns in the USA.Nat Rev Urol. 2017 Jan;14(1):26-37. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.251. Epub 2016 Dec 20. Nat Rev Urol. 2017. PMID: 27995937 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Chou R, Croswell JM, Dana T, Bougatsos C, Blazina I, Fu R, et al. Screening for prostate cancer: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(11):762–71. Epub 2011/10/11. - PubMed
-
- Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Ciatto S, Nelen V, et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1320–8. Epub 2009/03/20. - PubMed
-
- Kjellman A, Akre O, Norming U, Tornblom M, Gustafsson O. 15-year followup of a population based prostate cancer screening study. J Urol. 2009;181(4):1615–21. discussion 21. Epub 2009/02/24. - PubMed
-
- Labrie F, Candas B, Cusan L, Gomez JL, Belanger A, Brousseau G, et al. Screening decreases prostate cancer mortality: 11-year follow-up of the 1988 Quebec prospective randomized controlled trial. Prostate. 2004;59(3):311–8. Epub 2004/03/26. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
