Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Oct;6(4):280-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2013.04.006. Epub 2013 Jun 1.

Disparities in chronic conditions and health status by type of disability

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Disparities in chronic conditions and health status by type of disability

Willi Horner-Johnson et al. Disabil Health J. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Prior research has established health disparities between people with and without disabilities. However, disparities within the disability population, such as those related to type of disability, have been much less studied.

Objective: To examine differences in chronic conditions and health status between subgroups of people with different types of disability.

Methods: We analyzed Medical Expenditure Panel Survey annual data files from 2002 to 2008. Logistic regression analyses considered disparity from three perspectives: 1) basic differences, unadjusted for other factors; 2) controlling for key demographic and health covariates; and 3) controlling for a larger set of demographic variables and socioeconomic status as well as health and access to healthcare.

Results: Individuals with vision, physical, cognitive, or multiple disability types fared worse than people with hearing impairment on most health outcomes. This was most consistently true for people with multiple disabilities. Even when all covariates were accounted for, people with multiple types of disability were significantly more likely (p < 0.05) than those with hearing impairment (reference group) to report every poor health outcome with the exception of BMI ≥ 25 and lung disease.

Conclusions: While many of the differences between disability types were reduced when controlling for other factors, some differences remained significant. This argues for a more individualized approach to understanding and preventing chronic conditions and poor health in specific disability groups.

Keywords: Adult; Chronic conditions; Health status disparities; People with disabilities; Population surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
nalytic Sample Selection Process - Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component 2002-2008

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bennett KJ, Probst JC, Pumkam C. Obesity among working age adults: The role of county-level persistent poverty in rural disparities. Health Place. 2011;17(5):1174–1181. - PubMed
    1. Conron KJ, Mimiaga MJ, Landers SJ. A population-based study of sexual orientation identity and gender differences in adult health. Am.J.Public Health. 2010;100(10):1953. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cherepanov D, Palta M, Fryback DG, Robert SA, Hays RD, Kaplan RM. Gender differences in multiple underlying dimensions of health-related quality of life are associated with sociodemographic and socioeconomic status. Med.Care. 2011;49(11):1021. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2001.
    1. McDermott S, Platt T. The health of adults with disability in family practice-1990-2003. Paper presented at the Conference of the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities; Washington, DC. 2004.

Publication types