Effect of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy and automated insulin suspension vs standard insulin pump therapy on hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 24065010
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.277818
Effect of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy and automated insulin suspension vs standard insulin pump therapy on hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Importance: Hypoglycemia is a critical obstacle to the care of patients with type 1 diabetes. Sensor-augmented insulin pump with automated low-glucose insulin suspension has the potential to reduce the incidence of major hypoglycemic events.
Objective: To determine the incidence of severe and moderate hypoglycemia with sensor-augmented pump with low-glucose suspension compared with standard insulin pump therapy.
Design, setting, and participants: A randomized clinical trial involving 95 patients with type 1 diabetes, recruited from December 2009 to January 2012 in Australia.
Interventions: Patients were randomized to insulin pump only or automated insulin suspension for 6 months.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the combined incidence of severe (hypoglycemic seizure or coma) and moderate hypoglycemia (an event requiring assistance for treatment). In a subgroup, counterregulatory hormone responses to hypoglycemia were assessed using the hypoglycemic clamp technique.
Results: Of the 95 patients randomized, 49 were assigned to the standard-pump (pump-only) therapy and 46 to the low-glucose suspension group. The mean (SD) age was 18.6 (11.8) years; duration of diabetes, 11.0 (8.9) years; and duration of pump therapy, 4.1 (3.4) years. The baseline rate of severe and moderate hypoglycemic events in the pump-only group was 20.7 vs 129.6 events per 100 patient months in the low-glucose suspension group. After 6 months of treatment, the event rates decreased from 28 to 16 in the pump-only group vs 175 to 35 in the low-glucose suspension group. The adjusted incidence rate per 100 patient-months was 34.2 (95% CI, 22.0-53.3) for the pump-only group vs 9.5 (95% CI, 5.2-17.4) for the low-glucose suspension group. The incidence rate ratio was 3.6 (95% CI, 1.7-7.5; P <.001). There was no change in glycated hemoglobin in either group: mean, 7.4 (95% CI, 7.2-7.6) to 7.4 (95% CI, 7.2-7.7) in the pump-only group vs mean, 7.6 (95%, CI, 7.4-7.9) to 7.5 (95% CI, 7.3-7.7) in the low-glucose suspension group. Counterregulatory hormone responses to hypoglycemia were not changed. There were no episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperglycemia with ketosis.
Conclusions and relevance: Sensor-augmented pump therapy with automated insulin suspension reduced the combined rate of severe and moderate hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes.
Trial registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12610000024044.
Comment in
-
Insulin pump therapy with automated insulin suspension: toward freedom from nocturnal hypoglycemia.JAMA. 2013 Sep 25;310(12):1235-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278576. JAMA. 2013. PMID: 24065008 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A cost-effectiveness analysis of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy and automated insulin suspension versus standard pump therapy for hypoglycemic unaware patients with type 1 diabetes.Value Health. 2014 Jul;17(5):561-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.05.008. Epub 2014 Jul 15. Value Health. 2014. PMID: 25128049
-
"Let the Algorithm Do the Work": Reduction of Hypoglycemia Using Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy with Predictive Insulin Suspension (SmartGuard) in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes Patients.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Mar;19(3):173-182. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0349. Epub 2017 Jan 18. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017. PMID: 28099035 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Insulin Pump Therapy vs Insulin Injection Therapy With Severe Hypoglycemia, Ketoacidosis, and Glycemic Control Among Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1358-1366. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.13994. JAMA. 2017. PMID: 29049584 Free PMC article.
-
Sensor-Augmented Insulin Pumps and Hypoglycemia Prevention in Type 1 Diabetes.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jan;11(1):50-58. doi: 10.1177/1932296816672689. Epub 2016 Oct 6. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017. PMID: 28264173 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Unique Challenges of Type 1 Diabetes in the Preschool Population.Curr Diabetes Rev. 2017;13(2):122-131. doi: 10.2174/1573399812666151022143757. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2017. PMID: 26490431 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of atmospheric pressure change during flight on insulin pump delivery and glycaemic control of pilots with insulin-treated diabetes: an in vitro simulation and a retrospective observational real-world study.Diabetologia. 2024 Nov 4. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06295-1. Online ahead of print. Diabetologia. 2024. PMID: 39496965
-
Evaluating the Cost-Utility of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review of the Methods and Quality of Studies Using Decision Models or Empirical Data.Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Sep;42(9):929-953. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01388-6. Epub 2024 Jun 21. Pharmacoeconomics. 2024. PMID: 38904911 Free PMC article.
-
Insulin therapy among diabetic patients in rural communities of Sub-Saharan Africa: a perspective review.Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Feb 19;15:20420188241232280. doi: 10.1177/20420188241232280. eCollection 2024. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2024. PMID: 38379780 Free PMC article. Review.
-
14. Children and Adolescents: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(Suppl 1):S258-S281. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S014. Diabetes Care. 2024. PMID: 38078582 Review.
-
Current and future therapies to treat impaired awareness of hypoglycemia.Front Pharmacol. 2023 Oct 24;14:1271814. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1271814. eCollection 2023. Front Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 37942482 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
