Clinician gestalt estimate of pretest probability for acute coronary syndrome and pulmonary embolism in patients with chest pain and dyspnea
- PMID: 24070658
- DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.08.023
Clinician gestalt estimate of pretest probability for acute coronary syndrome and pulmonary embolism in patients with chest pain and dyspnea
Abstract
Study objective: Pretest probability helps guide diagnostic testing for patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome and pulmonary embolism. Pretest probability derived from the clinician's unstructured gestalt estimate is easier and more readily available than methods that require computation. We compare the diagnostic accuracy of physician gestalt estimate for the pretest probability of acute coronary syndrome and pulmonary embolism with a validated, computerized method.
Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a prospectively collected, multicenter study. Patients (N=840) had chest pain, dyspnea, nondiagnostic ECGs, and no obvious diagnosis. Clinician gestalt pretest probability for both acute coronary syndrome and pulmonary embolism was assessed by visual analog scale and from the method of attribute matching using a Web-based computer program. Patients were followed for outcomes at 90 days.
Results: Clinicians had significantly higher estimates than attribute matching for both acute coronary syndrome (17% versus 4%; P<.001, paired t test) and pulmonary embolism (12% versus 6%; P<.001). The 2 methods had poor correlation for both acute coronary syndrome (r(2)=0.15) and pulmonary embolism (r(2)=0.06). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were lower for clinician estimate compared with the computerized method for acute coronary syndrome: 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51 to 0.77) for clinician gestalt versus 0.78 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.85) for attribute matching. For pulmonary embolism, these values were 0.81 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.92) for clinician gestalt and 0.84 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.93) for attribute matching.
Conclusion: Compared with a validated machine-based method, clinicians consistently overestimated pretest probability but on receiver operating curve analysis were as accurate for pulmonary embolism but not acute coronary syndrome.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01059500.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Value and evidence-based medicine: a call for shared responsibility.Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Mar;63(3):290-1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.10.031. Epub 2013 Nov 13. Ann Emerg Med. 2014. PMID: 24239339 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Outcomes and radiation exposure of emergency department patients with chest pain and shortness of breath and ultralow pretest probability: a multicenter study.Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Mar;63(3):281-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Oct 10. Ann Emerg Med. 2014. PMID: 24120629
-
Prospective multicenter study of quantitative pretest probability assessment to exclude acute coronary syndrome for patients evaluated in emergency department chest pain units.Ann Emerg Med. 2006 May;47(5):447. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.10.013. Epub 2006 Jan 19. Ann Emerg Med. 2006. PMID: 16631984
-
Randomized trial of computerized quantitative pretest probability in low-risk chest pain patients: effect on safety and resource use.Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Jun;53(6):727-35.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.09.034. Epub 2009 Jan 9. Ann Emerg Med. 2009. PMID: 19135281 Clinical Trial.
-
Does this patient have pulmonary embolism?JAMA. 2003 Dec 3;290(21):2849-58. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.21.2849. JAMA. 2003. PMID: 14657070 Review.
-
Future developments in chest pain diagnosis and management.Med Clin North Am. 2010 Mar;94(2):375-400. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2010.01.010. Med Clin North Am. 2010. PMID: 20380961 Review.
Cited by
-
Derivation of a HEAR Pathway for Emergency Department Chest Pain Patients to Safely Avoid a Second Troponin Test.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 16;13(20):3217. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13203217. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37892038 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic screening versus clinical gestalt in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients in the emergency department.PLoS One. 2023 Mar 23;18(3):e0283459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283459. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36952456 Free PMC article.
-
Computerised clinical decision support system for the diagnosis of pulmonary thromboembolism: a preclinical pilot study.BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Mar;12(1):e001984. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001984. BMJ Open Qual. 2023. PMID: 36927628 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Major adverse cardiac event rates in moderate-risk patients: Does prior coronary disease matter?Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Jun;29(6):688-697. doi: 10.1111/acem.14462. Epub 2022 Mar 31. Acad Emerg Med. 2022. PMID: 35166427 Free PMC article.
-
Scoring systems for the triage and assessment of short-term cardiovascular risk in patients with acute chest pain.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Dec 22;22(4):1393-1403. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2204144. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2021. PMID: 34957779 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
