Comparison of attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis among patients with hereditary cancer syndromes
- PMID: 24072553
- PMCID: PMC4159051
- DOI: 10.1007/s10689-013-9685-0
Comparison of attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis among patients with hereditary cancer syndromes
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) allows couples to avoid having a child with an inherited condition, potentially reducing cancer burden in families with a hereditary cancer predisposition. This study investigated and compared awareness and acceptance of PGD among patients with different hereditary cancer syndromes. Questionnaires were mailed to 984 adults with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Lynch syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis, or multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 or 2. Associations between clinical, demographic, and psychosocial factors and awareness and acceptance of PGD were examined. Of 370 respondents (38 % return rate), 28 % felt their syndrome impacted family planning, 24 % were aware of PGD, 72 % felt that PGD should be offered, 43 % would consider using PGD, and 29 % were uncertain. Family experience and syndrome-specific characteristics, such as disease severity, quality of life and availability of medical interventions as well as gender, family planning stage, and religiosity impact perceptions of the acceptability of PGD, though a high level of uncertainty exists. Hereditary cancer patients lack awareness of PGD despite feeling that PGD should be offered, highlighting the need for education on this topic. While we found attitudes about the acceptability of PGD to be generally similar to those reported in the literature and of genetics and ethics experts, we observed similarities and differences between syndromes that provide insight into why some hereditary cancer patients may find PGD more acceptable than others.
Similar articles
-
Hereditary cancers in children and ethical and psychosocial implications.J Pediatr Nurs. 2000 Aug;15(4):217-25. doi: 10.1053/jpdn.2000.8044. J Pediatr Nurs. 2000. PMID: 10969494 Review.
-
High-risk consumers' perceptions of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Genet Med. 2012 Feb;14(2):191-200. doi: 10.1038/gim.0b013e31822ddc7e. Genet Med. 2012. PMID: 22261755 Review.
-
Singapore Cancer Network (SCAN) Guidelines for Referral for Genetic Evaluation of Common Hereditary Cancer Syndromes.Ann Acad Med Singap. 2015 Oct;44(10):492-510. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2015. PMID: 26763067
-
Professionals' knowledge, attitude and referral behaviour of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 Feb;36(2):137-144. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Dec 6. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018. PMID: 29242113
-
Knowledge, attitudes, and clinical experience of physicians regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes.Fam Cancer. 2010 Sep;9(3):479-87. doi: 10.1007/s10689-010-9343-8. Fam Cancer. 2010. PMID: 20431955
Cited by
-
Lynch Syndrome: From Multidisciplinary Management to Precision Prevention.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 20;16(5):849. doi: 10.3390/cancers16050849. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38473212 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Preimplantation genetic testing for embryos predisposed to hereditary cancer: Possibilities and challenges.Cancer Pathog Ther. 2023 May 16;2(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cpt.2023.05.002. eCollection 2024 Jan. Cancer Pathog Ther. 2023. PMID: 38328708 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Public Awareness and Acceptability of PGT-M in Cancer Predisposition Syndromes.Genes (Basel). 2023 Nov 12;14(11):2069. doi: 10.3390/genes14112069. Genes (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38003012 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders: clinical experience with BRCA1 and BRCA2 from 2010-2021.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Nov;40(11):2705-2713. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02925-6. Epub 2023 Sep 11. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023. PMID: 37691027
-
Management of individuals with germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in CHEK2: A clinical practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).Genet Med. 2023 Oct;25(10):100870. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100870. Epub 2023 Jul 25. Genet Med. 2023. PMID: 37490054
References
-
- Offit K, et al. Cancer genetic testing and assisted reproduction. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(29):4775–82. - PubMed
-
- The Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, A.M.A. Ethical issues related to prenatal genetic testing. Arch Fam Med. 1994;3(7):633–42. - PubMed
-
- King MC, Marks JH, Mandell JB. Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science. 2003;302(5645):643–6. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
