Median mandibular flexure at different mouth opening and its relation to different facial types: A prospective clinical study
- PMID: 24082745
- PMCID: PMC3783793
- DOI: 10.4103/0976-9668.117028
Median mandibular flexure at different mouth opening and its relation to different facial types: A prospective clinical study
Abstract
Objective: To measure the arch width and Median mandibular flexure (MMF) values at relative rest and maximum jaw opening in young adults with Dolichofacial, Mesofacial, and Brachyfacial types and tested whether the variation in the facial pattern is related to the MMF values in South Indian population.
Materials and methods: This Prospective clinical study consisted of sample of 60 young adults. The subjects were grouped into 3 groups: Group 1: Brachyfacial, Group 2: Mesofacial and types, Group 3: Dolichofacial. Impressions were taken for all the 60 subjects and the casts were scanned and digitized. The intermolar width was measured for Dolichofacial, Mesofacial, and Brachyfacial subjects at relative rest (R) and maximum opening (O).
Results: The statistical analysis of the observations included Descriptive and Inferential statistics. The statistical analysis was executed by means of Sigma graph pad prism software, USA Version-4. Kruskal wallis (ANOVA) followed by Dunns post hoc test was performed. Mann Whitney U-test was performed to assess the difference in MMF values between Males and Females of the three groups. The Mean (SD) Mandibular flexure in individuals with Brachyfacial type was 1.12 (0.09), Mesofacial type was 0.69 (0.21), and Dolichofacial type was 0.39 (0.08).
Conclusions: The Mean intermolar width was maximum in Brachyfacial type and minimum in Dolichofacial type. MMF was maximum at the maximum mouth opening position and was maximum in individuals with Brachyfacial type.
Keywords: Brachyfacial; dolichofacial; median mandibular flexure; mesofacial.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
The effect of mandibular flexure on the design of implant-supported fixed restorations of different facial types under two loading conditions by three-dimensional finite element analysis.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Aug 29;10:928656. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.928656. eCollection 2022. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022. PMID: 36105608 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Mandibular First Molars' Axial Inclination and Alveolar Morphology in Different Facial Patterns: A CBCT Study.Eur J Dent. 2020 Mar;14(2):250-259. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709932. Epub 2020 May 21. Eur J Dent. 2020. PMID: 32438429 Free PMC article.
-
Maximum occlusal force and medial mandibular flexure in relation to vertical facial pattern: a cross-sectional study.Head Face Med. 2007 Apr 2;3:18. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-3-18. Head Face Med. 2007. PMID: 17407566 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions of brachyfacial, mesofacial and dolichofacial individuals with regard to the buccal corridor in different facial types.J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 Sep-Oct;22(5):382-9. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720140003. J Appl Oral Sci. 2014. PMID: 25466472 Free PMC article.
-
[The therapeutic impact of the Begg technic on vertical dimension].Orthod Fr. 1989;60 Pt 2:861-71. Orthod Fr. 1989. PMID: 2490263 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Median mandibular flexure-the unique physiological phenomenon of the mandible and its clinical significance in implant restoration.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Sep 7;11:1238181. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1238181. eCollection 2023. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023. PMID: 37744259 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biomechanical Implications of Mandibular Flexion on Implant-Supported Full-Arch Rehabilitations: A Systematic Literature Review.J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 15;12(16):5302. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165302. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37629344 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mandibular Flexure and Its Significance: An In Vivo Cone Beam-Computed Tomography Proof-of-Concept Study.J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 20;12(12):4149. doi: 10.3390/jcm12124149. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37373841 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Influence of Mandibular Flexure on Oral Rehabilitation: Narrative Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 13;19(24):16748. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416748. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36554629 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The effect of mandibular flexure on the design of implant-supported fixed restorations of different facial types under two loading conditions by three-dimensional finite element analysis.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Aug 29;10:928656. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.928656. eCollection 2022. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022. PMID: 36105608 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lee RT. Arch width and form: A review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:305–13. - PubMed
-
- Abu Alhaija ES, Al Zo’ubi IA, Al Rousan ME, Hammad MM. Maximum occlusal bite forces in Jordanian Individuals with different dentofacial vertical skeletal patterns. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32:71–7. - PubMed
-
- Abdel-Latif HH, Hobkirk JA, Kelleway JP. Functional mandibular deformation in edentulous subjects treated from with dental implants. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13:513–9. - PubMed
-
- Du Brul EL, Sicher H. Springfield III: Charles.C Thomas Publisher; 1954. The adaptive chin.
-
- Hobkirk JA, Schwab J. Mandibular deformation in subjects with osseointegratedimplants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:319–28. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources