Cost effectiveness of treatments for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: focus on the novel oral anticoagulants

Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Nov;31(11):971-80. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0090-1.

Abstract

For more than 5 decades, the only available treatment for the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF)-related stroke were the vitamin K antagonists. Recently, novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have been approved for the prevention of AF-related stroke. In the present article, the cost effectiveness of AF-related stroke-prevention strategies is reviewed. The emphasis on NOACs aims to provide an overview of their impact on health economics based on the published cost-effectiveness analyses. The available evidence suggests that the balance from the efficacy and safety point of view makes the treatment with the NOACs a cost-effective alternative to warfarin. Thus, the NOACs offer efficacy, safety and convenience, as well as cost effectiveness, for stroke prevention in AF.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Oral
  • Anticoagulants / administration & dosage
  • Anticoagulants / economics
  • Anticoagulants / therapeutic use*
  • Atrial Fibrillation / complications
  • Atrial Fibrillation / drug therapy*
  • Atrial Fibrillation / economics
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Drug Approval
  • Humans
  • Stroke / economics
  • Stroke / etiology
  • Stroke / prevention & control*
  • Vitamin K / antagonists & inhibitors
  • Warfarin / administration & dosage
  • Warfarin / economics
  • Warfarin / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Anticoagulants
  • Vitamin K
  • Warfarin