Patient-physician colorectal cancer screening discussion content and patients' use of colorectal cancer screening
- PMID: 24094919
- PMCID: PMC3865022
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.008
Patient-physician colorectal cancer screening discussion content and patients' use of colorectal cancer screening
Abstract
Objective: The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends using the 5As (i.e., Assess, Advise, Agree, Assist and Arrange) when discussing preventive services. We evaluate the association of the 5As discussion during primary care office visits with patients' subsequent colorectal cancer (CRC) screening use.
Methods: Audio-recordings of n=443 periodic health exams among insured patients aged 50-80 years and due for CRC screening were joined with pre-visit patient surveys and screening use data from an electronic medical record. Association of the 5As with CRC screening was assessed using generalized estimating equations.
Results: 93% of patients received a recommendation for screening (Advise) and 53% were screened in the following year. The likelihood of screening increased as the number of 5A steps increased: compared to patients whose visit contained no 5A step, those whose visit contained 1-2 steps (OR=2.96 [95% CI 1.16, 7.53]) and 3 or more steps (4.98 [95% CI 1.84, 13.44]) were significantly more likely to use screening.
Conclusions: Physician CRC screening recommendations that include recommended 5A steps are associated with increased patient adherence.
Practice implications: A CRC screening recommendation (Advise) that also describes patient eligibility (Assess) and provides help to obtain screening (Assist) may lead to improved adherence to CRC screening.
Keywords: Colorectal cancer screening; Decision making; Patient–physician communication.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Patient-physician colorectal cancer screening discussions: delivery of the 5A's in practice.Am J Prev Med. 2011 Nov;41(5):480-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.07.018. Am J Prev Med. 2011. PMID: 22011418 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-physician colorectal cancer screening discussions and screening use.Am J Prev Med. 2006 Sep;31(3):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.04.010. Epub 2006 Jul 24. Am J Prev Med. 2006. PMID: 16905030 Free PMC article.
-
Physicians encouraging colorectal screening: a randomized controlled trial of enhanced office and patient management on compliance with colorectal cancer screening.Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jan 12;169(1):47-55. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.519. Arch Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19139323 Clinical Trial.
-
Screening for Colorectal Cancer and Evolving Issues for Physicians and Patients: A Review.JAMA. 2016 Nov 22;316(20):2135-2145. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.17418. JAMA. 2016. PMID: 27893135 Review.
-
Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: A systematic review.Prev Med. 2016 Dec;93:96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.034. Epub 2016 Sep 28. Prev Med. 2016. PMID: 27687535 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Patient-Provider Communication and Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion Using Multi-target Stool DNA Testing.J Cancer Educ. 2024 Jul 20. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02479-w. Online ahead of print. J Cancer Educ. 2024. PMID: 39031303
-
Automatic speech recognition performance for digital scribes: a performance comparison between general-purpose and specialized models tuned for patient-clinician conversations.AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2023 Apr 29;2022:1072-1080. eCollection 2022. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2023. PMID: 37128439 Free PMC article.
-
Adoption and Value of the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit: A Mixed-Methods Study.Med Care Res Rev. 2023 Aug;80(4):433-443. doi: 10.1177/10775587231166037. Epub 2023 Apr 26. Med Care Res Rev. 2023. PMID: 37098854 Free PMC article.
-
HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening promotion among Black individuals: social ecological perspectives from key informants interviews.Ethn Health. 2023 Oct;28(7):1026-1040. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2023.2193360. Epub 2023 Mar 27. Ethn Health. 2023. PMID: 36973897 Free PMC article.
-
"Mm-hm," "Uh-uh": are non-lexical conversational sounds deal breakers for the ambient clinical documentation technology?J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Mar 16;30(4):703-711. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad001. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023. PMID: 36688526 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Vernon SW. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Oct 1;89(19):1406–22. - PubMed
-
- Klabunde CN, Vernon SW, Nadel MR, Breen N, Seeff LC, Brown ML. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of reports from primary care physicians and average-risk adults. Med Care. 2005 Sep;43(9):939–44. - PubMed
-
- Steinwachs D, Allen JD, Barlow WE, Duncan RP, Egede LE, Friedman LS, et al. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Enhancing Use and Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening. Ann Intern Med. 2010 May 18;152(10):663–7. 2010. - PubMed
-
- Street RLJ, Makoul G, Arora NK, Epstein RM. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Mar;74(3):295–301. 2009. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
