Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):455-63.
doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001790. Epub 2013 Oct 4.

Using electronic health record data to develop inpatient mortality predictive model: Acute Laboratory Risk of Mortality Score (ALaRMS)

Affiliations

Using electronic health record data to develop inpatient mortality predictive model: Acute Laboratory Risk of Mortality Score (ALaRMS)

Ying P Tabak et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 May-Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Using numeric laboratory data and administrative data from hospital electronic health record (EHR) systems, to develop an inpatient mortality predictive model.

Methods: Using EHR data of 1,428,824 adult discharges from 70 hospitals in 2006-2007, we developed the Acute Laboratory Risk of Mortality Score (ALaRMS) using age, gender, and initial laboratory values on admission as candidate variables. We then added administrative variables using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)'s clinical classification software (CCS) and comorbidity software (CS) as disease classification tools. We validated the model using 770,523 discharges in 2008.

Results: Mortality predictors with ORs >2.00 included age, deranged albumin, arterial pH, bands, blood urea nitrogen, oxygen partial pressure, platelets, pro-brain natriuretic peptide, troponin I, and white blood cell counts. The ALaRMS model c-statistic was 0.87. Adding the CCS and CS variables increased the c-statistic to 0.91. The relative contributions were 69% (ALaRMS), 25% (CCS), and 6% (CS). Furthermore, the integrated discrimination improvement statistic demonstrated a 127% (95% CI 122% to 133%) overall improvement when ALaRMS was added to CCS and CS variables. In contrast, only a 22% (CI 19% to 25%) improvement was seen when CCS and CS variables were added to ALaRMS.

Conclusions: EHR data can generate clinically plausible mortality predictive models with excellent discrimination. ALaRMS uses automated laboratory data widely available on admission, providing opportunities to aid real-time decision support. Models that incorporate laboratory and AHRQ's CCS and CS variables have utility for risk adjustment in retrospective outcome studies.

Keywords: Decision Support; Electronic Health Record (EHR); Laboratory Data; Mortality Risk Model; Outcome Research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hosmer–Lemeshow calibration plot for: (A) the ALaRMS model; (B) the ALaRMS+CCS+CS model. ALaRMS, Acute Laboratory Risk of Mortality Score; CCS, clinical classification system; CS, comorbidity software.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hosmer–Lemeshow calibration plot for subgroup patients: (A) age 65 or older versus age younger than 65; (B) discharges from teaching versus non-teaching hospitals; (C) medical versus surgical discharges; (D) discharges from large (>300 beds) versus small/medium-sized (≤300 beds) hospitals; (E) discharges from urban versus rural hospitals.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 1993;270:2957–63 - PubMed
    1. Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA, McNair DS, et al. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2006;34:1297–310 - PubMed
    1. Escobar GJ, Greene JD, Scheirer P, et al. Risk-adjusting hospital inpatient mortality using automated inpatient, outpatient, and laboratory databases. Med Care 2008;46:232–9 - PubMed
    1. Tabak YP, Johannes RS, Silber JH. Using automated clinical data for risk adjustment: development and validation of six disease-specific mortality predictive models for pay-for-performance. Med Care 2007;45:789–805 - PubMed
    1. Pine M, Jordan HS, Elixhauser A, et al. Enhancement of claims data to improve risk adjustment of hospital mortality. JAMA 2007;297:71–6 - PubMed