Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep 27:7:617.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00617. eCollection 2013.

Microcognitive science: bridging experiential and neuronal microdynamics

Affiliations

Microcognitive science: bridging experiential and neuronal microdynamics

Claire Petitmengin et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Abstract

Neurophenomenology, as an attempt to combine and mutually enlighten neural and experiential descriptions of cognitive processes, has met practical difficulties which have limited its implementation into actual research projects. The main difficulty seems to be the disparity of the levels of description: while neurophenomenology strongly emphasizes the micro-dynamics of experience, at the level of brief mental events with very specific content, most neural measures have much coarser functional selectivity, because they mix functionally heterogeneous neural processes either in space or in time. We propose a new starting point for this neurophenomenology, based on (a) the recent development of human intra-cerebral EEG (iEEG) research to highlight the neural micro-dynamics of human cognition, with millimetric and millisecond precision and (b) a disciplined access to the experiential micro-dynamics, through specific elicitation techniques. This lays the foundation for a microcognitive science, the practical implementation of neurophenomenology to combine the neural and experiential investigations of human cognition at the subsecond level.

Keywords: elicitation; enaction; gamma band; microcognition; microdynamics; microgenesis; neuro-phenomenology; neurofeedback.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bastin J., Committeri G., Kahane P., Galati G., Minotti L., Lachaux J. P., et al. (2012). Timing of posterior parahippocampal gyrus activity reveals multiple scene processing stages. Hum. Brain Mapp. 9, 1193–1206 10.1002/hbm.21515 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crone N. E., Miglioretti D. L., Gordon B., Lesser R. P. (1998). Functional mapping of human sensorimotor cortex with electrocorticographic spectral analysis. II. Event-related synchronization in the gamma band. Brain 121, 2301–2315 10.1093/brain/121.12.2301 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fuster J. M. (2004). Upper processing stages of the perception–action cycle. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 143–145 10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garrison K. A., Santoyo J. F., Davis J. H., Thornhill T. A., Kerr C. E., Brewer J. A. (2013). Effortless awareness: using real time neurofeedback to investigate correlates of posterior cingulate cortex activity in meditators' self-report. Front. Neurosci. 7:440 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00440 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hamamé C. M., Vidal J. R., Ossandón T., Jerbi K., Dalal S. S., Minotti L., et al. (2012). Reading the mind's eye: online detection of visuo-spatial working memory and visual imagery in the inferior temporal lobe. Neuroimage 59, 872–879 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.087 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources