Subcutaneous progesterone versus vaginal progesterone gel for luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization: a noninferiority randomized controlled study
- PMID: 24140033
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.010
Subcutaneous progesterone versus vaginal progesterone gel for luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization: a noninferiority randomized controlled study
Abstract
Objective: To compare the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of subcutaneous progesterone (Prolutex, 25 mg; IBSA Institut Biochimique SA) with vaginal progesterone gel (Crinone, 8%; Merck Serono) for luteal phase support (LPS) in assisted reproduction technologies (ART) patients.
Design: Prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, two-arm, noninferiority study.
Setting: Thirteen European fertility clinics.
Patient(s): A total of 683 ART patients randomized to two groups: Prolutex, 25 mg subcutaneously daily (n = 339); and Crinone, 90 mg 8% gel daily (n = 344).
Intervention(s): In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer were performed according to site-specific protocols. On the day of oocyte retrieval, Prolutex or Crinone gel was begun for LPS and continued for up to 10 weeks.
Main outcome measure(s): Ongoing pregnancy rate.
Result(s): The primary end point, ongoing pregnancy rates at 10 weeks of treatment were 27.4% and 30.5% in the Prolutex and Crinone groups, respectively (intention to treat [ITT]). The nonsignificant difference between the groups was -3.09% (95% confidence interval [CI] -9.91-3.73), indicating noninferiority of Prolutex to Crinone. Delivery and live birth rates resulted to be equivalent between the two treatments (26.8% vs. 29.9% in the Prolutex and Crinone groups, respectively [ITT]; difference -3.10 [95% CI -9.87-3.68]). No statistically significant differences were reported for any of the other secondary efficacy endpoints, including comfort of usage and overall satisfaction.
Conclusion(s): Implantation rate, pregnancy rate, live birth rate, and early miscarriage rate for Prolutex were similar to those for Crinone. The adverse event profiles were similar and Prolutex was safe and well tolerated.
Clinical trial registration number: NCT00827983.
Keywords: Luteal phase support; intracytoplasmic sperm injection; in vitro fertilization; pregnancy; progesterone.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
A randomized, controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of aqueous subcutaneous progesterone with vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support of in vitro fertilization.Hum Reprod. 2014 Oct 10;29(10):2212-20. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu194. Epub 2014 Aug 6. Hum Reprod. 2014. PMID: 25100106 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and tolerability of vaginal progesterone capsules (Utrogest 200) compared with progesterone gel (Crinone 8%) for luteal phase support during assisted reproduction.Fertil Steril. 2005 Jun;83(6):1641-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.073. Fertil Steril. 2005. PMID: 15950631 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical use of aqueous subcutaneous progesterone compared with vaginal progesterone as luteal support in in vitro fertilization: A randomized controlled study in Taiwan.Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep;61(5):863-867. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2021.10.010. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 36088057 Clinical Trial.
-
Systematic review of the clinical efficacy of vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology cycles.Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 Jun;36(6):630-645. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 22. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018. PMID: 29550390 Review.
-
Luteal phase support.Fertil Steril. 2002 Feb;77(2):318-23. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02961-2. Fertil Steril. 2002. PMID: 11821090 Review.
Cited by
-
Luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology.Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2024 Mar;20(3):149-167. doi: 10.1038/s41574-023-00921-5. Epub 2023 Dec 18. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2024. PMID: 38110672 Review.
-
Subcutaneous progesterone administration provides a similar ongoing pregnancy rate compared with intramuscular progesterone administration in hormone replacement therapy frozen embryo transfer cycles.F S Rep. 2022 Nov 11;4(2):165-172. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2022.11.002. eCollection 2023 Jun. F S Rep. 2022. PMID: 37398616 Free PMC article.
-
Preparation of the endometrium for frozen embryo transfer: an update on clinical practices.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023 Jun 8;21(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12958-023-01106-5. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023. PMID: 37291605 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Supplementary dydrogesterone is beneficial as luteal phase support in artificial frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles compared to micronized progesterone alone.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 13;14:1128564. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1128564. eCollection 2023. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 36992810 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic use of long-acting intramuscular progesterone in addition to oral dydrogesterone as luteal phase support for single fresh blastocyst transfer: A pilot study.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 23;13:1039579. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1039579. eCollection 2022. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36619564 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
