Is the quality of data in an electronic medical record sufficient for assessing the quality of primary care?
- PMID: 24145818
- PMCID: PMC4078269
- DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001479
Is the quality of data in an electronic medical record sufficient for assessing the quality of primary care?
Abstract
Objective: Quality indicators for the treatment of type 2 diabetes are often retrieved from a chronic disease registry (CDR). This study investigates the quality of recording in a general practitioner's (GP) electronic medical record (EMR) compared to a simple, web-based CDR.
Methods: The GPs entered data directly in the CDR and in their own EMR during the study period (2011). We extracted data from 58 general practices (8235 patients) with type 2 diabetes and compared the occurrence and value of seven process indicators and 12 outcome indicators in both systems. The CDR, specifically designed for monitoring type 2 diabetes and reporting to health insurers, was used as the reference standard. For process indicators we examined the presence or absence of recordings on the patient level in both systems, for outcome indicators we examined the number of compliant or non-compliant values of recordings present in both systems. The diagnostic OR (DOR) was calculated for all indicators.
Results: We found less concordance for process indicators than for outcome indicators. HbA1c testing was the process indicator with the highest DOR. Blood pressure measurement, urine albumin test, BMI recorded and eye assessment showed low DOR. For outcome indicators, the highest DOR was creatinine clearance <30 mL/min or mL/min/1.73 m(2) and the lowest DOR was systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg.
Conclusions: Clinical items are not always adequately recorded in an EMR for retrieving indicators, but there is good concordance for the values of these items. If the quality of recording improves, indicators can be reported from the EMR, which will reduce the workload of GPs and enable GPs to maintain a good patient overview.
Keywords: Data Quality; Electronic Medical Record; Quality Indicators; Quality of Care; Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Are general practitioners characteristics associated with the quality of type 2 diabetes care in general practice? Results from the Norwegian ROSA4 study from 2014.Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Jun;36(2):170-179. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1459238. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018. PMID: 29717939 Free PMC article.
-
Illustrating the patient journey through the care continuum: Leveraging structured primary care electronic medical record (EMR) data in Ontario, Canada using chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as a case study.Int J Med Inform. 2020 Aug;140:104159. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104159. Epub 2020 May 19. Int J Med Inform. 2020. PMID: 32473567
-
Temporal trend in quality indicators of diabetes care performance among persons with type 2 diabetes in primary care practice: a serial cross-sectional analytical study, 2013/14 to 2021/22.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 23;15:1359904. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1359904. eCollection 2024. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 39507052 Free PMC article.
-
Development of quality indicators for type 2 diabetes, extractable from the electronic health record of the general physician. A rand-modified Delphi method.Prim Care Diabetes. 2020 Feb;14(1):75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 Jun 14. Prim Care Diabetes. 2020. PMID: 31204263 Review.
-
Development of quality indicators for care of chronic kidney disease in the primary care setting using electronic health data: a RAND-modified Delphi method.Clin Exp Nephrol. 2017 Apr;21(2):247-256. doi: 10.1007/s10157-016-1274-8. Epub 2016 May 4. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2017. PMID: 27145768 Review.
Cited by
-
Electronic health record data quality assessment and tools: a systematic review.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Sep 25;30(10):1730-1740. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad120. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023. PMID: 37390812 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of patient- and GP-reported core sets of quality indicators for older adults with multimorbidity in primary care: results of the cross-sectional observational MULTIqual validation study.BMC Med. 2023 Apr 17;21(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02856-0. BMC Med. 2023. PMID: 37069536 Free PMC article.
-
CHARGE-AF in a national routine primary care electronic health records database in the Netherlands: validation for 5-year risk of atrial fibrillation and implications for patient selection in atrial fibrillation screening.Open Heart. 2021 Jan;8(1):e001459. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001459. Open Heart. 2021. PMID: 33462107 Free PMC article.
-
Development of standard indicators to assess use of electronic health record systems implemented in low-and medium-income countries.PLoS One. 2021 Jan 11;16(1):e0244917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244917. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33428656 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating Morbidity Rates Based on Routine Electronic Health Records in Primary Care: Observational Study.JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Jul 26;7(3):e11929. doi: 10.2196/11929. JMIR Med Inform. 2019. PMID: 31350839 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Maarse H, Bartholomée Y. Course and impact of market reform in Dutch health care uncertain. Intereconomics 2008;43:189–94
-
- van de Ven WPMM, Schut FT. Universal mandatory health insurance in the Netherlands: a model for the United States? Health Aff 2008;27:771–81 - PubMed
-
- Rosenau PV, Lako CJ. An experiment with regulated competition and individual mandates for universal health care: the new Dutch health insurance system. J Health Polit Policy Law 2008;33:1031–55 - PubMed
-
- Custers T, Arah OA, Klazinga NS. Is there a business case for quality in The Netherlands? A critical analysis of the recent reforms of the health care system. Health Policy 2007;82:226–39 - PubMed
-
- van Althuis TR, Bastiaanssen EHC, Bouma M. Overzicht en definitie van diabetesindicatoren huisartsenzorg (Overview and definition of diabetes indicators in primary health care). Utrecht: Dutch College of General Practitioners, 2011:1–31
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
