Urologists' use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
- PMID: 24152262
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1201141
Urologists' use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
Abstract
Background: Some urology groups have integrated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), a radiation treatment with a high reimbursement rate, into their practice. This is permitted by the exception for in-office ancillary services in the federal prohibition against self-referral. I examined the association between ownership of IMRT services and use of IMRT to treat prostate cancer.
Methods: Using Medicare claims from 2005 through 2010, I constructed two samples: one comprising 35 self-referring urology groups in private practice and a matched control group comprising 35 non-self-referring urology groups in private practice, and the other comprising non-self-referring urologists employed at 11 National Comprehensive Cancer Network centers matched with 11 self-referring urology groups in private practice. I compared the use of IMRT in the periods before and during ownership and used a difference-in-differences analysis to evaluate changes in IMRT use according to self-referral status.
Results: The rate of IMRT use by self-referring urologists in private practice increased from 13.1 to 32.3%, an increase of 19.2 percentage points (P<0.001). Among non-self-referring urologists, the rate of IMRT use increased from 14.3 to 15.6%, an increase of 1.3 percentage points (P=0.05). The unadjusted difference-in-differences effect was 17.9 percentage points (P<0.001). The regression-adjusted increase in IMRT use associated with self-referral was 16.4 percentage points (P<0.001). The rate of IMRT use by urologists working at National Comprehensive Cancer Network centers remained stable at 8.0% but increased by 33.0 percentage points among the 11 matched self-referring urology groups. The regression-adjusted difference-in-differences effect was 29.3 percentage points (P<0.001).
Conclusions: Urologists who acquired ownership of IMRT services increased their use of IMRT substantially more than urologists who did not own such services. Allowing urologists to self-refer for IMRT may contribute to increased use of this expensive therapy. (Funded by the American Society for Radiation Oncology.).
Comment in
-
Prostate cancer: IMRT treatment rates increase with urologist self-referral.Nat Rev Urol. 2013 Dec;10(12):680. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.256. Epub 2013 Nov 12. Nat Rev Urol. 2013. PMID: 24217677 No abstract available.
-
Joint statement by members of the NCCN Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel.J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013 Nov;11(11):1310-2. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0155. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013. PMID: 24225965 No abstract available.
-
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 13;370(7):679-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1314524. N Engl J Med. 2014. PMID: 24521125 No abstract available.
-
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 13;370(7):679. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1314524. N Engl J Med. 2014. PMID: 24521126 No abstract available.
-
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 13;370(7):679. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1314524. N Engl J Med. 2014. PMID: 24521127 No abstract available.
-
Re: urologists' use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.J Urol. 2014 May;191(5):1292. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.071. Epub 2014 Feb 22. J Urol. 2014. PMID: 24745495 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Urologists' self-referral for pathology of biopsy specimens linked to increased use and lower prostate cancer detection.Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Apr;31(4):741-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1372. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012. PMID: 22492891
-
Re: urologists' use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.J Urol. 2014 May;191(5):1292. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.071. Epub 2014 Feb 22. J Urol. 2014. PMID: 24745495 No abstract available.
-
Integrated prostate cancer centers and over-utilization of IMRT: a close look at fee-for-service medicine in radiation oncology.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Apr;76(5):1285-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.060. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010. PMID: 20338470 No abstract available.
-
The negative impact of stark law exemptions on graduate medical education and health care costs: the example of radiation oncology.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Apr;76(5):1289-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.11.061. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010. PMID: 20338471 Review.
-
Physician refer thyself: is Stark II, phase III the final voyage?Pain Physician. 2007 Nov;10(6):725-41. Pain Physician. 2007. PMID: 17987094 Review.
Cited by
-
Urologist practice divestment from radiation vault ownership and treatment patterns for prostate cancer.Cancer. 2024 May 1;130(9):1609-1617. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35168. Epub 2023 Dec 26. Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38146764
-
Nonclinical factors associated with the treatment of older women with newly diagnosed low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ.Cancer. 2024 Apr 1;130(7):1041-1051. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35124. Epub 2023 Nov 21. Cancer. 2024. PMID: 37987170
-
The Current Trend of Radiation Therapy for Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer.Curr Oncol. 2023 Sep 1;30(9):8092-8110. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30090587. Curr Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37754502 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Does a Change in Physician Compensation Lead to Changes in Care Delivery in Family Medicine Clinics?WMJ. 2022 Dec;121(4):280-284. WMJ. 2022. PMID: 36637838 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Understanding Hospital-Level Patterns of Nonoperative Management for Low-risk Thyroid and Kidney Cancer.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2242210. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.42210. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 36378306 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical