Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 26 (4), 396-400

Computed Tomography (CT) Simulated Fluoroscopy-Guided Transdiscal Approach in Transcrural Celiac Plexus Block

Affiliations

Computed Tomography (CT) Simulated Fluoroscopy-Guided Transdiscal Approach in Transcrural Celiac Plexus Block

Yu Gyeong Kong et al. Korean J Pain.

Abstract

Conventional transcrural CPB via the "walking off" the vertebra technique may injure vital organs while attempting to proximally spread injectate around the celiac plexus. Therefore, we attempted the CT-simulated fluoroscopy-guided transdiscal approach to carry out transcrural CPB in a safer manner, spreading the injectate more completely and closely within the celiac plexus area. A 54-year-old male patient with pancreatic cancer suffered from severe epigastric pain. The conventional transcrural approach was simulated, but the needle pathway was impeded by the kidney on the right side and by the aorta on the left side. After simulating the transdiscal pathway through the T11-12 intervertebral disc, we predetermined the optimal insertion point (3.6 cm from the midline), insertion angle (18 degrees), and advancement plane, as well as the proper depth. With the transdiscal approach, we successfully performed transcrural CPB within a narrow angle, and the bilateral approach was not necessary as we were able to achieve the bilateral spread of the injectate with the single approach.

Keywords: CT simulated fluoroscopy-guided; celiac plexus block; transcrural approach; transdiscal approach.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The axial image of abdominal CT at the level T12 showing the celiac trunk. (A) The lines drawn according to the conventional transcrural approach was impeded by kidney in right side and aorta in left side. (B) Right needle pathway via transdiscal in transcrural approach was drawn on the image at the level T12-L1 intervertebra disc. I: the right needle insertion point, S: midline of spinous process, IS: 3.6 cm, *The angle for needle insertion on the right.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Fluoroscopic views of needle location and contrast flow. (A) On an anteroposterior view, the contrast spread across the midline. (b) On the lateral view, the needle penetrated disc, and its tip is located approximately 2/3 of AP diameter anterior to vertebra body.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Bahn BM, Erdek MA. Celiac plexus block and neurolysis for pancreatic cancer. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013;17:310. - PubMed
    1. Kim WH, Lee CJ, Sim WS, Shin BS, Ahn HJ, Lim HY. Anatomical analysis of computed tomography images for determining the optimal oblique fluoroscope angle for percutaneous coeliac plexus block. J Int Med Res. 2011;39:1798–1807. - PubMed
    1. Moore DC, Bush WH, Burnett LL. Celiac plexus block: a roentgenographic, anatomic study of technique and spread of solution in patients and corpses. Anesth Analg. 1981;60:369–379. - PubMed
    1. Ischia S, Luzzani A, Ischia A, Faggion S. A new approach to the neurolytic block of the coeliac plexus: the transaortic technique. Pain. 1983;16:333–341. - PubMed
    1. Ischia S, Ischia A, Polati E, Finco G. Three posterior percutaneous celiac plexus block techniques. A prospective, randomized study in 61 patients with pancreatic cancer pain. Anesthesiology. 1992;76:534–540. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback