Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Oct 11;10(10):4812-35.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph10104812.

Domestic Water Service Delivery Indicators and Frameworks for Monitoring, Evaluation, Policy and Planning: A Review

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Domestic Water Service Delivery Indicators and Frameworks for Monitoring, Evaluation, Policy and Planning: A Review

Georgia L Kayser et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Monitoring of water services informs policy and planning for national governments and the international community. Currently, the international monitoring system measures the type of drinking water source that households use. There have been calls for improved monitoring systems over several decades, some advocating use of multiple indicators. We review the literature on water service indicators and frameworks with a view to informing debate on their relevance to national and international monitoring. We describe the evidence concerning the relevance of each identified indicator to public health, economic development and human rights. We analyze the benefits and challenges of using these indicators separately and combined in an index as tools for planning, monitoring, and evaluating water services. We find substantial evidence on the importance of each commonly recommended indicator--service type, safety, quantity, accessibility, reliability or continuity of service, equity, and affordability. Several frameworks have been proposed that give structure to the relationships among individual indicators and some combine multiple indicator scores into a single index but few have been rigorously tested. More research is needed to understand if employing a composite metric of indicators is advantageous and how each indicator might be scored and scaled.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A Framework for Monitoring Water Quality & Sanitary Risk (Reprinted from Water Science and Technology 1991, volume 24, pages 61–75, with permission from the copyright holders, IWA Publishing).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The WHO-UNICEF JMP water serivce ladder (Adapted from [34] with permission).
Figure 3
Figure 3
A multiple-use services framework (Adapted from [35] with permission).
Figure 4
Figure 4
IRC water service delivery ladder framework (Adapted from [20,38] with permission).

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 15 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bradley D., Bartram J. Domestic water and sanitation as water security: Monitoring, concepts and strategy. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Ser. A. 2013 in press. - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO/UNICEF . Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation; Meeting the MDG Drinking Water and Sanitation Target: A Mid-Term Assessment of Progress, 2004. World Health Organization & United Nations Children’s Fund; Geneva, Switzerland: 2004.
    1. Onda K., LoBuglio J., Bartram J. Global access to safe water: Accounting for water quality and the resulting impact on MDG progress. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2012;93:880–894. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee E., Schwab K. Deficiencies in drinking water distribution systems in developing countries. J. Water Health. 2005;3:109–127. - PubMed
    1. Bartram J. Improving on haves and have-nots. Nature. 2008;452:283–284. doi: 10.1038/452283a. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Feedback