Specialties differ in which aspects of doctor communication predict overall physician ratings
- PMID: 24163151
- PMCID: PMC3930786
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-013-2663-2
Specialties differ in which aspects of doctor communication predict overall physician ratings
Abstract
Background: Effective doctor communication is critical to positive doctor-patient relationships and predicts better health outcomes. Doctor communication is the strongest predictor of patient ratings of doctors, but the most important aspects of communication may vary by specialty.
Objective: To determine the importance of five aspects of doctor communication to overall physician ratings by specialty.
Design: For each of 28 specialties, we calculated partial correlations of five communication items with a 0-10 overall physician rating, controlling for patient demographics.
Patients: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group (CG-CAHPS®) 12-month Survey data collected 2005-2009 from 58,251 adults at a 534-physician medical group.
Main measures: CG-CAHPS includes a 0 ("Worst physician possible") to 10 ("Best physician possible") overall physician rating. Five doctor communication items assess how often the physician: explains things; listens carefully; gives easy-to-understand instructions; shows respect; and spends enough time.
Key results: Physician showing respect was the most important aspect of communication for 23/28 specialties, with a mean partial correlation (0.27, ranging from 0.07 to 0.44 across specialties) that accounted for more than four times as much variance in the overall physician rating as any other communication item. Three of five communication items varied significantly across specialties in their associations with the overall rating (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: All patients valued respectful treatment; the importance of other aspects of communication varied significantly by specialty. Quality improvement efforts by all specialties should emphasize physicians showing respect to patients, and each specialty should also target other aspects of communication that matter most to their patients. The results have implications for improving provider quality improvement and incentive programs and the reporting of CAHPS data to patients. Specialists make important contributions to coordinated patient care, and thus customized approaches to measurement, reporting, and quality improvement efforts are important.
Comment in
-
R-E-S-P-E-C-T--what it means to patients.J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Mar;29(3):427-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2710-z. J Gen Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24395098 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
R-E-S-P-E-C-T-implications for physicians and physicians-to-be.J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Aug;29(8):1096. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2871-4. J Gen Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24789626 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
R-E-S-P-E-C-T: physician-patient communication.J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Aug;29(8):1097. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2870-5. J Gen Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24841556 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
How the CAHPS Clinician and Group Patient Experience Survey Data Have Been Used in Research: A Systematic Review.J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2024 Jul 16;11(2):88-96. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.2056. eCollection 2024 Summer. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2024. PMID: 39044849 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 May;473(5):1590-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3981-3. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. PMID: 25287521 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the content of the communication items in the CAHPS(®) clinician and group survey and supplemental items with what high-performing physicians say they do.Patient. 2013;6(3):169-77. doi: 10.1007/s40271-013-0016-1. Patient. 2013. PMID: 23716167
-
Patient Comments on the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group (CG-CAHPS) Survey Reflect Improvements in Provider Behaviors From Coaching.J Healthc Manag. 2023 Jul-Aug 01;68(4):251-267. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-22-00140. Epub 2023 Jun 19. J Healthc Manag. 2023. PMID: 37326612 Free PMC article.
-
The Voice of Chinese Health Consumers: A Text Mining Approach to Web-Based Physician Reviews.J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 10;18(5):e108. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4430. J Med Internet Res. 2016. PMID: 27165558 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Associations of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Clinician and Group Survey Scores with Interventions and Site, Provider, and Patient Factors: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.J Patient Exp. 2024 Oct 13;11:23743735241283204. doi: 10.1177/23743735241283204. eCollection 2024. J Patient Exp. 2024. PMID: 39403289 Free PMC article.
-
How the CAHPS Clinician and Group Patient Experience Survey Data Have Been Used in Research: A Systematic Review.J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2024 Jul 16;11(2):88-96. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.2056. eCollection 2024 Summer. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2024. PMID: 39044849 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Use of Web-Based Patient Reviews to Assess Medical Oncologists' Competency: Mixed Methods Sequential Explanatory Study.JMIR Form Res. 2023 May 4;7:e39857. doi: 10.2196/39857. JMIR Form Res. 2023. PMID: 37140959 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship Between Patient-Centered Primary Care Provider Communication and Emergency Room Visits in the Medicaid Population in North Carolina, United States.J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231171430. doi: 10.1177/21501319231171430. J Prim Care Community Health. 2023. PMID: 37102612 Free PMC article.
-
Shadow Coaching Improves Patient Experience for English-Preferring Patients but not for Spanish-Preferring Patients.J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Aug;38(11):2494-2500. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08045-2. Epub 2023 Feb 16. J Gen Intern Med. 2023. PMID: 36797540 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Beck R, Daughtridge R, Sloane P. Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. J Am Board Fam Med. 2002;15(1):25–38. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
