Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Feb;164(2):393-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.09.047. Epub 2013 Oct 30.

Delays in diagnosis of congenital hearing loss in rural children

Affiliations

Delays in diagnosis of congenital hearing loss in rural children

Matthew L Bush et al. J Pediatr. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the incidence of pediatric congenital hearing loss and the timing of diagnosis in a rural region of hearing healthcare disparity.

Study design: Data from the Kentucky newborn hearing-screening program was accessed to determine the incidence of congenital hearing loss in Kentucky, both in the extremely rural region of Appalachia and non-Appalachian region of Kentucky. We also performed a retrospective review of records of children with congenital hearing loss at our institution to determine the timing of diagnostic testing.

Results: In Kentucky, during 2009-2011, there were 6970 newborns who failed hearing screening; the incidence of newborn hearing loss was 1.71 per 1000 births (1.28/1000 in Appalachia and 1.87/1000 in non-Appalachia); 23.8% of Appalachian newborns compared with 17.3% of non-Appalachian children failed to obtain follow-up diagnostic testing. Children from Appalachia were significantly delayed in obtaining a final diagnosis of hearing loss compared with children from non-Appalachian regions (P = .04).

Conclusion: Congenital hearing loss in children from rural regions with hearing healthcare disparities is a common problem, and these children are at risk for a delay in the timing of diagnosis, which has the potential to limit language and social development. It is important to further assess the causative factors and develop interventions that can address this hearing healthcare disparity issue.

Keywords: ABR; Auditory brainstem response; EDHI; Early detection of hearing loss and intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan Meier analysis of time (weeks after birth) to final diagnosis of congenital hearing loss
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation analysis of hearing services timing.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities. [Accessed March 27, 2011];Hearing loss. at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/dd/ddhi.htm.
    1. U S. Preventive Services Task Force. Universal screening for hearing loss in newborns: U.S Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Pediatrics. 2008;122:143–148. - PubMed
    1. Kennedy C, McCann D, Campbell M, Law CM, Mullee M, Petrou S, et al. Language ability after early detection of permanent childhood hearing impairment. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2131–2141. - PubMed
    1. Apuzzo ML, Yoshinaga-Itano C. Early identification of infants with significant hearing loss and the Minnesota Child Development Inventory. Semin Hear. 1995;16:124–137.
    1. Moeller MP. Early intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearing. Pediatrics. 2000;106:E43. - PubMed

Publication types