Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Oct 23;8(10):e79026.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079026. eCollection 2013.

Comparative sucrose responsiveness in Apis mellifera and A. cerana foragers

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative sucrose responsiveness in Apis mellifera and A. cerana foragers

Wenchao Yang et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

  • PLoS One. 2013;8(12). doi:10.1371/annotation/20dfdf0f-eab5-4ed6-ba0f-37b55b5ccf6a

Abstract

In the European honey bee, Apis mellifera, pollen foragers have a higher sucrose responsiveness than nectar foragers when tested using a proboscis extension response (PER) assay. In addition, Africanized honey bees have a higher sucrose responsiveness than European honey bees. Based on the biology of the Eastern honey bee, A. cerana, we hypothesized that A. cerana should also have a higher responsiveness to sucrose than A. mellifera. To test this hypothesis, we compared the sucrose thresholds of pollen foragers and nectar foragers in both A. cerana and A. mellifera in Fujian Province, China. Pollen foragers were more responsive to sucrose than nectar foragers in both species, consistent with previous studies. However, contrary to our hypothesis, A. mellifera was more responsive than A. cerana. We also demonstrated that this higher sucrose responsiveness in A. mellifera was not due to differences in the colony environment by co-fostering two species of bees in the same mixed-species colonies. Because A. mellifera foragers were more responsive to sucrose, we predicted that their nectar foragers should bring in less concentrated nectar compared to that of A. cerana. However, we found no differences between the two species. We conclude that A. cerana shows a different pattern in sucrose responsiveness from that of Africanized bees. There may be other mechanisms that enable A. cerana to perform well in areas with sparse nectar resources.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Percentage of bees showing proboscis extension response (mean+SE) of pollen (P, solid) and nectar (N, empty) foragers of Apis mellifera (triangles) and A. cerana (circles) in their own colonies, across different sucrose concentrations (plotted as log scale but with actual concentrations).
A: unfed foragers tested directly, Data based on 10 colonies per species (N = 600 bees). B: foragers tested 30 min after being fed 5μl 30% sucrose solution. Data based on 5 colonies per species (N = 300 bees).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Percentage of bees showing proboscis extension response (mean+SE) of pollen (P, solid) and nectar (N, empty) foragers of Apis mellifera (triangles) and A. cerana (circles) of unknown-aged foragers in mixed-species colonies, across different sucrose concentrations (plotted as log scale but with actual concentrations).
Data based on 3 mixed-species colonies (N = 3 x 2 x 2 x 10 = 120 bees).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Percentage of bees showing proboscis extension response (mean+SE) of 14-day-old workers from three mixed-species colonies, of Apis mellifera (triangles) and A. cerana (circles).
%PER were significantly higher in A. mellifera than A. cerana. Data based on 3 mixed-species colonies (N = 60 bees).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Sugar concentrations from crop of returning foragers of A. cerana (empty) and A. mellfiera (hatched).
A: The average sugar concentrations of foragers caught each hour in both species; B: The lowest sugar concentration during each hour from foragers of both species.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhou BF, Jiang WJ, Zhang LC (1991) The nectar foraging ability of individual A. cerana. Apiculture China 4: 3-6.
    1. Li HL, Yang YX, Shen LR, Gao QK, Cheng JA (2007) Construction and analysis of cDNA library of worker head from Apis cerana cerana . Apiculture China 58(6): 8-10.
    1. Wang FH, Yang F, Geng JH, Xu XL (2007) Conservation and utilization of the Chinese honeybee Apis cerana in Beijing. Chinese. Bull Entomol 44(6): 923-927.
    1. Pankiw T, Page RE (2003) Effect of pheromones, hormones, and handling on sucrose response thresholds of honey bees (Apis mellifera . p. L.). J Comp Physiol A 189: 675-684 - PubMed
    1. McCabe SI, Hartfelder K, Santana WC, Farina WM (2007) Odor discrimination in classical conditioning of proboscis extension in two stingless bee species in comparison to Africanized honeybees. J Comp Physiol A 193: 1089-1099. doi:10.1007/s00359-007-0260-8. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

The authors are thankful for the support of Honey Bee Biology Observation Station (Fujian) of Agriculture Ministry of China. This work was funded by grants from Fujian Provincial Department of Science and Technology (2011J05043 to WY), Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (to XM) and the Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-Industry Technology Research System (CARS-45-KXJ19). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

LinkOut - more resources