The first nationwide evaluation of robotic general surgery: a regionalized, small but safe start
- PMID: 24196549
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3239-2
The first nationwide evaluation of robotic general surgery: a regionalized, small but safe start
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the most commonly performed robotic-assisted general surgery (RAGS) procedures in a nationwide database and compare them with their laparoscopic counterparts.
Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried from October 2008 to December 2010 for patients undergoing elective, abdominal RAGS procedures. The two most common, robotic-assisted fundoplication (RF) and gastroenterostomy without gastrectomy (RG), were individually compared with the laparoscopic counterparts (LF and LG, respectively).
Results: During the study, 297,335 patients underwent abdominal general surgery procedures, in which 1,809 (0.6 %) utilized robotic-assistance. From 2009 to 2010, the incidence of RAGS nearly doubled from 573 to 1128 cases. The top five RAGS procedures by frequency were LG, LF, laparoscopic lysis of adhesions, other anterior resection of rectum, and laparoscopic sigmoidectomy. Eight of the top ten RAGS were colorectal or foregut operations. RG was performed in 282 patients (0.9 %) and LG in 29,677 patients (99.1 %). When comparing RG with LG there was no difference in age, gender, race, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), postoperative complications, or mortality; however, length of stay (LOS) was longer in RG (2.5 ± 2.4 vs. 2.2 ± 1.5 days; p < 0.0001). Total cost for RG was substantially higher ($60,837 ± 28,887 vs. $42,743 ± 23,366; p < 0.0001), and more often performed at teaching hospitals (87.2 vs. 50.9 %; p < 0.0001) in urban areas (100 vs. 93.0 %; p < 0.0001). RF was performed in 272 patients (3.5 %) and LF in 7,484 patients (96.5 %). RF patients were more often male compared with LF (38.2 vs. 32.3 %; p < 0.05); however, there was no difference in age, race, CCI, LOS, or postoperative complications. RF was more expensive than LF ($37,638 ± 21,134 vs. $32,947 ± 24,052; p < 0.0001), and more often performed at teaching hospitals (72.4 vs. 54.9 %; p < 0.0001) in urban areas (98.5 vs. 88.7 %; p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: This nationwide study of RAGS exemplifies its low but increasing incidence across the country. RAGS is regionalized to urban teaching centers compared with conventional laparoscopic techniques. Despite similar postoperative outcomes, there is significantly increased cost associated with RAGS.
Similar articles
-
Comparative outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic approaches to gastrectomy: a National Cancer Database study.Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):7530-7537. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10204-9. Epub 2023 Jul 11. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 37433916
-
Robotic Surgery Is More Expensive with Similar Outcomes in Sleeve Gastrectomy: Analysis of the NIS Database.Am Surg. 2019 Jan 1;85(1):39-45. Am Surg. 2019. PMID: 30760343
-
Safe implementation of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer under the requirements for universal health insurance coverage: a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide registry database in Japan.Gastric Cancer. 2022 Mar;25(2):438-449. doi: 10.1007/s10120-021-01257-7. Epub 2021 Oct 12. Gastric Cancer. 2022. PMID: 34637042 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: The largest meta-analysis.Int J Surg. 2020 Oct;82:210-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.053. Epub 2020 Aug 12. Int J Surg. 2020. PMID: 32800976 Review.
-
Robotic versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obes Surg. 2017 Jan;27(1):245-253. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2444-1. Obes Surg. 2017. PMID: 27815863 Review.
Cited by
-
Robotic surgery versus Laparoscopic surgery for anti-reflux and hiatal hernia surgery: a short-term outcomes and cost systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Jun 6;409(1):175. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03368-y. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024. PMID: 38842610 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia. 2024 Apr;28(2):321-332. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02881-1. Epub 2023 Sep 19. Hernia. 2024. PMID: 37725188 Review.
-
Robotic-assisted surgery training (RAST) program: module 1 of a three-module program. Assessment of patient cart docking skills and educational environment.Updates Surg. 2023 Jun;75(4):825-835. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01485-9. Epub 2023 Mar 2. Updates Surg. 2023. PMID: 36862353
-
A propensity score matching study of totally robotic right hemicolectomy versus robot-assisted right hemicolectomy.J Robot Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):905-914. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01472-z. Epub 2022 Nov 6. J Robot Surg. 2023. PMID: 36335530
-
Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic hernia repair: real-world evidence from the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC).Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1331-1341. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07511-w. Epub 2020 Mar 31. Surg Endosc. 2021. PMID: 32236756
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
