Use of guideline-based antibiotic prophylaxis in women undergoing gynecologic surgery

Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;122(6):1145-53. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a8a36a.

Abstract

Objective: To examine guideline-based use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients who underwent gynecologic surgery.

Methods: We identified women who underwent gynecologic surgery between 2003 and 2010. Procedures were stratified as antibiotic-appropriate (abdominal, vaginal, or laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy) or antibiotic-inappropriate (oophorectomy, cystectomy, tubal ligation, dilation and curettage, myomectomy, and tubal ligation). Antibiotic use was examined using hierarchical regression models.

Results: Among 545,332 women who underwent procedures for which antibiotics were recommended, 87.1% received appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis, 2.3% received nonguideline-recommended antibiotics, and 10.6% received no prophylaxis. Use of antibiotics increased from 88.0% in 2003 to 90.7% in 2010 (P<.001). Among 491,071, who underwent operations for which antibiotics were not recommended, antibiotics were administered to 197,226 (40.2%) women. Use of nonguideline-based antibiotics also increased over time from 33.4% in 2003 to 43.7% in 2010 (P<.001). Year of diagnosis, surgeon and hospital procedural volume, and area of residence were the strongest predictors of guideline-based and nonguideline-based antibiotic use.

Conclusion: Although use of antibiotics is high for women who should receive antibiotics, antibiotics are increasingly being administered to women for whom the drugs are of unproven benefit.

Level of evidence: : III.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Comment

MeSH terms

  • Antibiotic Prophylaxis / standards*
  • Female
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / standards*
  • Humans
  • Surgical Wound Infection / prevention & control*