Risk-adjusted comparison of blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) noncontrol in primary care offices
- PMID: 24204062
- PMCID: PMC4544740
- DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.06.130017
Risk-adjusted comparison of blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) noncontrol in primary care offices
Abstract
Objectives: Population-level control of modifiable cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors is suboptimal. The objectives of this study were (1) to demonstrate the use of electronically downloaded electronic health record (EHR) data to assess guideline concordance in a large cohort of primary care patients, (2) to provide a contemporary assessment of blood pressure (BP) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) noncontrol in primary care, and (3) to demonstrate the effect of risk adjustment of rates of noncontrol of BP and LDL for differences in patient mix on these clinic-level performance measures.
Methods: This was an observational comparative effectiveness study that included 232,172 adult patients ≥18 years old with ≥1 visit within 2 years in 33 primary care clinics with EHRs. The main measures were rates of BP and LDL noncontrol based on current guidelines and were calculated from electronically downloaded EHR data. Rates of noncontrol were risk-adjusted using multivariable models of patient-level variables.
Results: Overall, 16.0% of the 227,122 patients with known BP and 14.9% of the 136,771 patients with known LDL were uncontrolled. Clinic-level, risk-adjusted BP noncontrol ranged from 7.7% to 26.5%, whereas that for LDL ranged from 5.8% to 23.6%. Rates of noncontrol exceeded an achievable benchmark for 85% (n = 28) and 79% (n = 26) of the 33 clinics for BP and LDL, respectively. Risk adjustment significantly influences clinic rank order for rate of noncontrol.
Conclusions: We demonstrated that the use of electronic collection of data from a large cohort of patients from fee-for-service primary care clinics is feasible for the audit of and feedback on BP and LDL noncontrol. Rates of noncontrol for most clinics are substantially higher than those achievable. Risk adjustment of noncontrol rates results in a rank-order of clinics very different from that achieved with nonadjusted data.
Keywords: Blood Pressure; Cholesterol; Clinical Practice Guideline; Electronic Health Records; Feedback; Health Information Management.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Validity of Medical Record Abstraction and Electronic Health Record-Generated Reports to Assess Performance on Cardiovascular Quality Measures in Primary Care.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e209411. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9411. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 32721028 Free PMC article.
-
Inferior control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in women is the primary sex difference in modifiable cardiovascular risk: A large-scale, cross-sectional study in primary care.Atherosclerosis. 2021 May;324:141-147. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.02.024. Epub 2021 Feb 23. Atherosclerosis. 2021. PMID: 33810858
-
Association Between Cumulative Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Exposure During Young Adulthood and Middle Age and Risk of Cardiovascular Events.JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Dec 1;6(12):1406-1413. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.3508. JAMA Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 34550307 Free PMC article.
-
Lifetime risk assessment in cholesterol management among hypertensive patients: observational cross-sectional study based on electronic health record data.BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Apr 14;21(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01138-5. BMC Fam Pract. 2020. PMID: 32290820 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of risk assessment and management programme for hypertension on clinical outcomes and cardiovascular disease risks after 12 months: a population-based matched cohort study.J Hypertens. 2017 Mar;35(3):627-636. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001177. J Hypertens. 2017. PMID: 27861244 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The Affordable Care Act: Effects of Insurance on Diabetes Biomarkers.Diabetes Care. 2020 Sep;43(9):2074-2081. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1571. Epub 2020 Jul 1. Diabetes Care. 2020. PMID: 32611609 Free PMC article.
-
Disparities in Biomarkers for Patients With Diabetes After the Affordable Care Act.Med Care. 2020 Jun;58 Suppl 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 6 1):S31-S39. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001257. Med Care. 2020. PMID: 32412951 Free PMC article.
-
New approaches to measuring the comprehensiveness of primary care physicians.Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr;54(2):356-366. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13101. Epub 2019 Jan 6. Health Serv Res. 2019. PMID: 30613955 Free PMC article.
-
The use of Electronic Health Records to Support Population Health: A Systematic Review of the Literature.J Med Syst. 2018 Sep 29;42(11):214. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-1075-6. J Med Syst. 2018. PMID: 30269237 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Active Use of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and Personal Health Records (PHRs) for Epidemiologic Research: Sample Representativeness and Nonresponse Bias in a Study of Women During Pregnancy.EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017 Feb 23;5(1):1263. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1263. eCollection 2017. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017. PMID: 28303255 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Heidenreich PA, Trogdon JG, Khavjou OA, et al. Forecasting the Future of Cardiovascular Disease in the United States: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123:933–944. - PubMed
-
- Hozawa A, Folsom AR, Sharrett AR, Chambless LE. Absolute and attributable risks of cardiovascular disease incidence in relation to optimal and borderline risk factors: comparison of African American with white subjects--Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:573–579. - PubMed
-
- Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, et al. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet. 2005;366:1267–1278. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources