Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):547-57.
doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002116. Epub 2013 Nov 12.

ICD-10 codes used to identify adverse drug events in administrative data: a systematic review

Affiliations
Review

ICD-10 codes used to identify adverse drug events in administrative data: a systematic review

Corinne M Hohl et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 May-Jun.

Erratum in

  • J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):757. Doyle-Waters, Mimi [added]

Abstract

Background: Adverse drug events, the unintended and harmful effects of medications, are important outcome measures in health services research. Yet no universally accepted set of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) revision 10 codes or coding algorithms exists to ensure their consistent identification in administrative data. Our objective was to synthesize a comprehensive set of ICD-10 codes used to identify adverse drug events.

Methods: We developed a systematic search strategy and applied it to five electronic reference databases. We searched relevant medical journals, conference proceedings, electronic grey literature and bibliographies of relevant studies, and contacted content experts for unpublished studies. One author reviewed the titles and abstracts for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two authors reviewed eligible full-text articles and abstracted data in duplicate. Data were synthesized in a qualitative manner.

Results: Of 4241 titles identified, 41 were included. We found a total of 827 ICD-10 codes that have been used in the medical literature to identify adverse drug events. The median number of codes used to search for adverse drug events was 190 (IQR 156-289) with a large degree of variability between studies in the numbers and types of codes used. Authors commonly used external injury (Y40.0-59.9) and disease manifestation codes. Only two papers reported on the sensitivity of their code set.

Conclusions: Substantial variability exists in the methods used to identify adverse drug events in administrative data. Our work may serve as a point of reference for future research and consensus building in this area.

Keywords: Administrative Data; Comparative Effectiveness and Safety Research; Drug Safety; International Classification of Diseases; Patient Safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of included studies.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gu Q, Dillon CF, Burt VL. Prescription drug use continues to increase: US prescription drug data for 2007–2008. NCHS Data Brief 2010. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db42.pdf (accessed 9 Feb 2013).
    1. Nebeker J, Barach P, Samore M. Clarifying adverse drug events: a clinician's guide to terminology, documentation, and reporting. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:795–801 - PubMed
    1. Bates D. Drugs and adverse drug reactions. How worried should we be? JAMA 1998;279:1216–17 - PubMed
    1. Slone Epidemiology Center. Patterns of Medication Use in the United States 2004: a Report from the Slone Survey. 2004. http://www.bu.edu/slone/SloneSurvey/AnnualRpt/SloneSurveyWebReport2006.pdf (accessed April 2010).
    1. Gurwitz JH, Field TS, Harrold LR, et al. Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. JAMA 2003;289:1107–16 - PubMed

MeSH terms