Patterns of treatment, healthcare utilization and costs by lines of therapy in metastatic breast cancer in a large insured US population
- PMID: 24236561
- DOI: 10.2217/cer.13.1
Patterns of treatment, healthcare utilization and costs by lines of therapy in metastatic breast cancer in a large insured US population
Erratum in
- J Comp Eff Res. 2013 May;2(3):346
Abstract
Aim: Metastatic breast cancer guidelines contain multiple lines of treatment and regimens; however, little data on therapeutic patterns and costs is available from real-world clinical practice. This descriptive study reports chemotherapy and biologic use, healthcare utilization and costs by line of therapy in a large insured US population.
Materials & methods: Adult women with newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer (between 2005 and 2009) were identified from MarketScan® databases containing medical and pharmacy claims of >40 million enrollees insured with >100 US health plans. Descriptive statistics were reported for use, duration and mean per patient per month costs across four lines of therapy.
Results: Out of 7767 patients identified (mean [standard deviation] age = 58.2 [12] years), ≥50% received a subsequent line of therapy across the four lines (line 2: n = 4077; line 3: n = 2033; line four: n = 1059). The top two chemotherapies were paclitaxel and capecitabine in lines one and two, and paclitaxel and gemcitabine in lines three and four. The top two biologics were trastuzumab and bevacizumab across the multiple lines of treatments. Duration (mean, standard deviation and median days) varied across multiple lines of treatments: 162.7, 176.9 and 108.0 in line one; 147.5, 146.7 and 99.0 in line two; 139.9, 131.1 and 99.0 in line three; and 130.9, 123.4 and 94.0 in line four, respectively. Mean per patient per month costs decreased with increasing follow-up from US$13,147 (<6 months) to US$11,610 (7-12 months) to US$10,219 (12-24 months) to US$9,192 (24-36 months) to US$7,384 (>36 months). Cumulative costs increased with follow-up, from US$78,882 (<6 months) to US$443,062 (>36 months).
Conclusion: Longer follow-up, regardless of number of lines of therapy, was associated with higher cumulative, but lower monthly, costs. Delaying progression and improving survival with more individualized treatment regimens may help slow the rate of increasing long-term costs of metastatic breast cancer treatment and care.
Similar articles
-
Healthcare costs associated with bevacizumab and cetuximab in second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.J Med Econ. 2011;14(5):542-52. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.596600. Epub 2011 Jul 6. J Med Econ. 2011. PMID: 21728912
-
Comparison of medical costs and healthcare resource utilization of post-menopausal women with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer receiving everolimus-based therapy or chemotherapy: a retrospective claims database analysis.J Med Econ. 2016;19(4):414-23. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1131704. J Med Econ. 2016. PMID: 27032967
-
Assessing the economic burden of breast cancer in a US managed care population.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 May;109(2):367-77. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9650-4. Epub 2007 Aug 3. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008. PMID: 17674201
-
Economic impact of the growing population of breast cancer survivors.Cancer Control. 2001 Mar-Apr;8(2):177-83. doi: 10.1177/107327480100800211. Cancer Control. 2001. PMID: 11326173 Review. No abstract available.
-
The development of biological therapies for breast cancer.Science. 1993 Jan 29;259(5095):631-2. doi: 10.1126/science.8430312. Science. 1993. PMID: 8430312 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Palbociclib Adherence and Persistence in Patients with Hormone Receptor Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Negative (HR+/HER2-) Metastatic Breast Cancer.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Apr 18;17:1049-1062. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S401480. eCollection 2023. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023. PMID: 37096162 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant in the Second-Line Treatment of Women With HR+/HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer: A US Payer Perspective.Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 2;8:658747. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.658747. eCollection 2021. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021. PMID: 34150798 Free PMC article.
-
Capecitabine for hormone receptor-positive versus hormone receptor-negative breast cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 26;5(5):CD011220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011220.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34037241 Free PMC article.
-
Prior Treatment Time Affects Survival Outcomes in Metastatic Breast Cancer.JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020 Jun;4:500-513. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00008. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020. PMID: 32479187 Free PMC article.
-
Cost of Disease Progression in Patients with Metastatic Breast, Lung, and Colorectal Cancer.Oncologist. 2019 Sep;24(9):1209-1218. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0018. Epub 2019 Feb 22. Oncologist. 2019. PMID: 30796156 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical